2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Assessment and Management for CO2 Capture and Transport Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as CGS is built into a natural body (a geological formation) risk can be understood as a combination of natural and technological hazards because some causes of possible leaks do not only depend on the operation of technology as usually happens in industrial plants and consequently the causes are not perfectly known or understood (Morgado and Esteves, 2011). Engebø et al (2013) also bring forward that risks associated with CO 2 capture and transport are satisfactorily managed when planned, different from risk related to storage, for which there is no large operational experience.…”
Section: Risks In Cgs Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as CGS is built into a natural body (a geological formation) risk can be understood as a combination of natural and technological hazards because some causes of possible leaks do not only depend on the operation of technology as usually happens in industrial plants and consequently the causes are not perfectly known or understood (Morgado and Esteves, 2011). Engebø et al (2013) also bring forward that risks associated with CO 2 capture and transport are satisfactorily managed when planned, different from risk related to storage, for which there is no large operational experience.…”
Section: Risks In Cgs Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, they emphasise the importance of monitoring tools and techniques with time depending on specific risks. Engebø et al (2013) discuss the challenges related to risk assessment at each stage in the CCS project.…”
Section: Risks In Cgs Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%