2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.1792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and Timing of Cardiovascular Disease After Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer

Abstract: Our results support that there should be a solid indication for ADT in men with PCa so that benefit outweighs potential harm; this is of particular importance among men with a recent history of CVD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
160
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(9 reference statements)
9
160
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies, however, have suggested that the number of CVD events in PCa patients differs between different types of ADT, indicating that other mechanisms than the mere lack of testosterone is involved. In observational studies and a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials, a higher rate of CVD events was found in patients treated with GnRH receptor agonists compared with bilateral orchiectomy or GnRH antagonists 4, 5, 9. These studies are hypothesis‐generating and the findings await confirmation in randomized trials with CVD as a prespecified end point, but the idea of a divergent effect of orchiectomy, GnRH agonists and antagonists on atherosclerosis‐related disease is supported by experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies, however, have suggested that the number of CVD events in PCa patients differs between different types of ADT, indicating that other mechanisms than the mere lack of testosterone is involved. In observational studies and a post hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials, a higher rate of CVD events was found in patients treated with GnRH receptor agonists compared with bilateral orchiectomy or GnRH antagonists 4, 5, 9. These studies are hypothesis‐generating and the findings await confirmation in randomized trials with CVD as a prespecified end point, but the idea of a divergent effect of orchiectomy, GnRH agonists and antagonists on atherosclerosis‐related disease is supported by experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCa cases and their matched comparison cohort of PCa-free men were subsequently linked to a series of national healthcare registers and demographic databases to obtain data on discharge diagnoses, surgical procedures, socio-economic status and cause of death. Based on information from the National Patient Register, comorbidities were measured using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), which assigns weights to a number of medical conditions, including diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, allowing a final comorbidity score to be calculated for each individual [13,15]. Each condition is assigned a score of 1, 2, 3 or 6, and the final CCI is given as the sum of these scores [13].…”
Section: Study Population and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the present study was to investigate the risk of TED in men with PCa on ADT by considerably expanding our previous analyses using data from PCBaSe Sweden 3.0. We accounted for known TED risk factors, such as changes in medication, TURP, palliative radiotherapy and nephrostomy, as well as surgical cancer treatments to distil the impact of different types and duration of ADT on the risk of TED [1,2,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While increased risk of CVD in patients receiving ADT has been demonstrated in a number of observational studies, 9 these findings have been…”
Section: Controversies In Adt-associated Cvdmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…9 Furthermore, there is evidence for the increased incidence of CV events in PC patients receiving GnRH agonist-based ADT, which is not seen with antagonist-based ADT. 10 Given the patient demographics of PC, as many as 30% of men with advanced PC are likely to be at high risk of a CV event -making CV risk a key factor in assessing patients for the optimal ADT modality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%