1998
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and Resilience: Implications for the Delivery of Educational and Mental Health Services in Schools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Community assets (like educational, faith, and service institutions) affect resilience (Anderson, Sabatelli, & Kosutic, 2007; Molnar et al, 2008) and mental health (Fitzpatrick, Piko, Wright, & LaGory, 2005). Communities can build resilience and promote health at school, through connectedness with teachers and other adults (Benard, 2004; Luthar, 2003; Resnick, 2000b), peer supports (Morrison & Allen, 2007), opportunities for participation in after-school programs (Eccles & Barber, 1999), and school-based services (Doll & Lyon, 1998). For example, many Alameda County schools have school-based health centers, which help schools better support and nurture the whole child.…”
Section: Applying Resilience Concepts To Public Health Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community assets (like educational, faith, and service institutions) affect resilience (Anderson, Sabatelli, & Kosutic, 2007; Molnar et al, 2008) and mental health (Fitzpatrick, Piko, Wright, & LaGory, 2005). Communities can build resilience and promote health at school, through connectedness with teachers and other adults (Benard, 2004; Luthar, 2003; Resnick, 2000b), peer supports (Morrison & Allen, 2007), opportunities for participation in after-school programs (Eccles & Barber, 1999), and school-based services (Doll & Lyon, 1998). For example, many Alameda County schools have school-based health centers, which help schools better support and nurture the whole child.…”
Section: Applying Resilience Concepts To Public Health Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of resilience provides one possible explanation for the ability of some individuals to maintain positive mental health in the face of adverse life circumstances [ 13 ]. Whilst often an inconsistently defined construct [ 14 , 15 ], the concept involves the ability, when faced with stress or adversity, to actively employ individual traits (internal factors) and wider social, community and environmental supports (external factors) to return to or maintain a positive state of mental health and functioning [ 16 ]. Internal resilience factors include personal strengths and factors such as self-efficacy and problem-solving skills [ 17 - 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of external restrictive control measures to manage the perceived risk of harm to others may serve the function of assisting agencies with meeting their own needs to manage unease, rather than meeting the needs of the young person. A contradiction with the available research base is therefore identified, as disengagement or detachment from education provision is an established protective factor for health (Carlson et al, 2008), mental health (Doll & Lyon, 1998), and against offending behavior (Yoshikawa, 1994). As a result, practitioners’ experiences of encountering unease by other agencies demonstrates variation in understanding of the role each agency should play in achieving the key aim of reducing recidivism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%