Risk and Recovery From Course Failure in the Early Years of High School

Abstract

For many urban adolescents, the transition to and early years of high school are a time of academic difficulty and increasing school disengagement. In Chicago, over 40% of ninth graders fail one or more major subjects in the first semester. This article examines patterns in the relative risk of course failure and recovery from failure over the first four semesters of high school in one urban school system. It examines how failure rates vary as a function of race, ethnicity, gender, age, and prior achievement and examines between-school variation in student petformance. Males and Hispanic students are particularly at risk. Few students recover from grade failure, and early failure often translates into poorer later performance. Schools vary widely in rates of failure and recovery--variation that remains after adjusting for differences in schools' student body composition. Implications for further research and policy are discussed.

Cooperative Learning in Science: Follow‐up from primary to high school

“…In a sample of 25,795 students (average age 14.09 years) almost one quarter of students who had good eighth grade attainment results failed at least one subject in ninth grade in the first semester after transition to senior high school high school in Chicago, Illinois, USA (Roderick & Camburn, 1999 …”

The Impact of Vocational Schooling on Human Capital Development in Developing Countries: Evidence from China

“…Another reason for the low mathematics gains for academic high school students is that they were entering a new school (their first year of high school). As is common in the United States, for example, students entering a new schooling environment may have muted learning gains as they adjust to their new environment (e.g., see Roderick and Camburn 1999).…”

Beginning with the End in Mind: The District Office Leadership Role in Closing the Graduation Gap for At-Risk Students

“…It is crucial to move beyond the focus on test score data that has thus far dominated the DDDM process (Mac Iver and Farley-Ripple 2009). A series of studies identifying early behavioral indicators of a dropout outcome Easton 2005, 2007;Balfanz and Herzog 2005;Balfanz, Herzog, and Mac Iver 2007;Neild, Stoner-Eby, and Furstenburg 2008;Roderick and Camburn 1999) laid the groundwork for the type of district data analysis advocated by the guidebook of America's Promise Alliance ) which has been carried out in several districts (Mac Iver, Balfanz, and Byrnes 2009;Neild and Balfanz 2006b;Plank, Boccanfuso, and Balfanz 2010). Cohort studies in several urban districts which used individual student-level data to follow a cohort of sixth graders or ninth graders forward to their on-time graduation year (and sometimes a year or two past) identified key early warning indicators of a dropout outcome: chronic absenteeism; behavior problems; and course failure.…”