2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and outcome profile of carotid endarterectomy with proximal intervention is concerning in multi-institutional assessment

Abstract: Perioperative stroke and death with CEA + IPE are substantial and consistent across centers. It is strikingly different from isolated CEA or CEA added to open brachiocephalic reconstruction. Restenosis is frequent, and reintervention at either the proximal stent or bifurcation is common. This technical strategy should be used cautiously and selectively reserved for those who are symptomatic with hemodynamically relevant tandem lesions and unfit for open revascularization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the cardiovascular event rate during follow up was high, and warrants intensified follow up of this high risk patient group. If these results are compared with the results of a recently published study, it must be reaffirmed that only 15% of the patients in the study by Clouse et al 10 were treated with this original hybrid approach. Remarkably, all peri-procedural strokes (9.6%) were observed in patients who were treated by the non-original hybrid approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the cardiovascular event rate during follow up was high, and warrants intensified follow up of this high risk patient group. If these results are compared with the results of a recently published study, it must be reaffirmed that only 15% of the patients in the study by Clouse et al 10 were treated with this original hybrid approach. Remarkably, all peri-procedural strokes (9.6%) were observed in patients who were treated by the non-original hybrid approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The most recently published study reported a clinical follow up of six years and an imaging (only duplex) follow up of three years. 10 The current study is the first reporting imaging follow up data for as long as six years after hybrid revascularisation. In addition, this most recently published study performed the original hybrid approach in only 15% of the patients (n ¼ 9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations