2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk and benefits of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for neonatal and childhood respiratory diseases in Low- and Middle-Income countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In situations where mechanical ventilation might not be available, bubble nasal CPAP may be used for newborns and children with severe hypoxemia, and may be a more readily available alternative in resource-limited settings (46).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situations where mechanical ventilation might not be available, bubble nasal CPAP may be used for newborns and children with severe hypoxemia, and may be a more readily available alternative in resource-limited settings (46).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis pooled a neonatal and the two paediatric studies above suggesting safety and overall favourable benefit with the use of bCPAP in LMIC. 9 In contrast to previous studies, the Malawi study (n=644) showed an increase in mortality (11% vs 17%) with the use of bCPAP, and the trial was stopped early. These findings represent a sentinel event and deserve to be examined thoroughly.…”
Section: Bubble Cpap In Resource-poor Settings: Friend or Foe?mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In situations where mechanical ventilation might not be available, bubble nasal CPAP may be a more readily available alternative for newborns and children with severe hypoxemia. 41 …”
Section: Ardsmentioning
confidence: 99%