1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)63152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Adjustment of the Postoperative Morbidity Rate for the Comparative Assessment of the Quality of Surgical Care: Results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
155
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main outcome measure was any postoperative complication(s) in the 30 days after surgery, a composite measure based on 20 complications monitored by VASQIP during the study period. 28 Complications were grouped into 5 subtypes associated with alcohol misuse: surgical field complications, infectious complications other than surgical site infections (SSI), cardiopulmonary complications, neurologic complications, and bleeding complications. 4,5,[29][30][31] Surgical field complications included wound disruption, graft prosthesis failure, organ/space surgical site infection, and superficial and deep wound infections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main outcome measure was any postoperative complication(s) in the 30 days after surgery, a composite measure based on 20 complications monitored by VASQIP during the study period. 28 Complications were grouped into 5 subtypes associated with alcohol misuse: surgical field complications, infectious complications other than surgical site infections (SSI), cardiopulmonary complications, neurologic complications, and bleeding complications. 4,5,[29][30][31] Surgical field complications included wound disruption, graft prosthesis failure, organ/space surgical site infection, and superficial and deep wound infections.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PUF contains patient level aggregate data and does not identify hospitals, healthcare providers, or patients. The data collection and sampling methodology has been previously described in detail [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of SCNR training, data collection, sampling methodology, and IRR auditing has been described in detail previously [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%