2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Acceptance in Multiple Sclerosis Patients on Natalizumab Treatment

Abstract: ObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the ability of natalizumab (NTZ)-treated patients to assume treatment-associated risks and the factors involved in such risk acceptance. MethodsFrom a total of 185 patients, 114 patients on NTZ as of July 2011 carried out a comprehensive survey. We obtained disease severity perception scores, personality traits’ scores, and risk-acceptance scores (RAS) so that higher RAS indicated higher risk acceptance. We recorded JC virus status (JCV+/-), prior immunosuppression, NTZ treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this difference is unclear, but may, at least for JCV positivity, relate to differences in risk perception. 17 Finally, the degree of disability also affected the pattern of discontinuation rates, with higher disease activity being associated with lower drug survival. In both cohorts this was explained mostly by lack of effect, and to a lesser degree of increased rates of adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this difference is unclear, but may, at least for JCV positivity, relate to differences in risk perception. 17 Finally, the degree of disability also affected the pattern of discontinuation rates, with higher disease activity being associated with lower drug survival. In both cohorts this was explained mostly by lack of effect, and to a lesser degree of increased rates of adverse events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of PML in immune-mediated diseases has recently increased as a consequence of an improved use of biologics and other potent immune-modulatory medications (Berger, 2010 ). Few studies are present in literature that demonstrate a real risk of PML development in CIRDs patients whereas several researches have focused on a possible correlation between JCPyV viremia and the biological therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and CD (Lavagna et al, 2007 ; Verbeeck et al, 2008 ; Bellizzi et al, 2011 , 2013a , b ; Bharat et al, 2012 ; Comar et al, 2013 ; Iacobaeus et al, 2013 ; Tur et al, 2013 ; Frohman et al, 2014 ). Therefore, it could be interesting to understand whether there is a correlation between biologics administered for CIRDs and the opportunity that the virus escapes from latency, replicates actively and spreads to the brain causing PML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, patients at low risk of developing MS progression may prefer to avoid ‘risky’ treatments (as they have low gains while having a risk of developing side effects), whereas high-risk patients would prefer the most effective treatment even if need to take higher risks (as they have a higher chance of having a progression leading to more disability) (Fig. 2 ) [ 24 , 31 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: The Proposed Solution: Bringing Together Advances In Ms Treamentioning
confidence: 99%