The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk acceptance and maintenance optimization of aging civil engineering infrastructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors extend these results to optimal repair and retrofit of existing structures in Streicher et al (2008), and present a renewal model for cost-benefit optimization including three different maintenance strategies (Rackwitz and Joanni, 2009).…”
Section: Risk Optimization Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The authors extend these results to optimal repair and retrofit of existing structures in Streicher et al (2008), and present a renewal model for cost-benefit optimization including three different maintenance strategies (Rackwitz and Joanni, 2009).…”
Section: Risk Optimization Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The risk optimization formulation addresses the safety-economy tradeoff in structural design [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. The optimal reliabilities 𝛽 * are a sub-product of the analysis.…”
Section: Risk Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk optimization [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]74] increases the scope of RBDO by including the expected consequences of failure. Each failure event described in Figure 4 has different consequences.…”
Section: Risk Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an effort was made in the case of the development and application of the so-called Life-Quality Index (e.g. [26][27][28][29]). The latter is able to provide a rational basis to account for the cost of saving lives [26], but, as shown by Goda and Hong [30], has certain limitations, since it does not control the optimal seismic design in some cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%