Rising Tides or Rising Stars?: Dynamics of Shared Attention on Twitter during Media Events

Abstract

“Media events” generate conditions of shared attention as many users simultaneously tune in with the dual screens of broadcast and social media to view and participate. We examine how collective patterns of user behavior under conditions of shared attention are distinct from other “bursts” of activity like breaking news events. Using 290 million tweets from a panel of 193,532 politically active Twitter users, we compare features of their behavior during eight major events during the 2012 U.S. presidential election to examine how patterns of social media use change during these media events compared to “typical” time and whether these changes are attributable to shifts in the behavior of the population as a whole or shifts from particular segments such as elites. Compared to baseline time periods, our findings reveal that media events not only generate large volumes of tweets, but they are also associated with (1) substantial declines in interpersonal communication, (2) more highly concentrated attention by replying to and retweeting particular users, and (3) elite users predominantly benefiting from this attention. These findings empirically demonstrate how bursts of activity on Twitter during media events significantly alter underlying social processes of interpersonal communication and social interaction. Because the behavior of large populations within socio-technical systems can change so dramatically, our findings suggest the need for further research about how social media responses to media events can be used to support collective sensemaking, to promote informed deliberation, and to remain resilient in the face of misinformation.

Hurricanes and hashtags: How the media and NGOs treat citizens’ voices online in humanitarian emergencies

“…While eyewitness accounts are important and certainly played a role in disaster coverage of recent times, in the aftermath of such disasters it appears that journalists still turned to governments, officials and businesses; as Lin et al (2014) found in the political sphere, elite voices continue to crowd out more diverse voices when such disastrous events take place.…”

“…For example, a study on BBC convergent news of the Haiti earthquake shows that only eight web-stream entries came from 'average people' in Haiti whilst the remaining 42 are attributed either to western NGOs or to westerners who are indirectly touched by the earthquake (Chouliaraki 2010: 316). This is backed up with the recent study by Lin et al (2014), who looked at tweets around the 2012 US presidential election. They concluded that despite the potential for social media to create larger public squares with more diverse voices speaking, occasions for large-scale shared attention appear to undermine this deliberative potential by replacing existing interpersonal social dynamics with increased collective attention to existing 'stars' (Lin et al 2014: 10).…”

Episogram: Visual Summarization of Egocentric Social Interactions

“…The Twitter dataset [11] was collected during the U.S presidential election debates held in October 2012. For demonstration purposes, we selected a set of most active users who posted or retweeted the most in the data.…”

Twitter in the Analysis of Social Phenomena: An Interpretative Framework

“…Researchers were also able to show that various events during the campaign for the US Presidential election in 2012 were detectable by shifts in user behavior (e.g. Lin et al 2014). These studies show that various offline phenomena lead to shifts in the micro-behavior of users that can be detected in aggregate data.…”