2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.02010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rising caesarean section rates: a cause for concern?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that although the model of obstetrician‐led care is characterised by increased rates of intervention, outcomes for women with a single baby delivered at term are no worse, and further studies may determine there are benefits for women and their babies. This is consistent with findings from both the United Kingdom 26 and developing countries 27 that increases in the rate of caesarean section are associated with a reduction in the rate of perinatal mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our results show that although the model of obstetrician‐led care is characterised by increased rates of intervention, outcomes for women with a single baby delivered at term are no worse, and further studies may determine there are benefits for women and their babies. This is consistent with findings from both the United Kingdom 26 and developing countries 27 that increases in the rate of caesarean section are associated with a reduction in the rate of perinatal mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is of particular importance to study the CSD at this time because of its rising rates in Mexico, Canada, and some European, Asian, and South American countries such as Brazil, where the rate in public hospitals is as high as 80% (Kambo, Bedi, Dhillon, & Saxena, 2002; Lin & Xirasagar, 2004; Matthews et al, 2003; Trujillo‐Hernandez et al, 2002). Increases in CSD rates may be attributed to a range of factors, including obstetric practice, litigation issues, financial incentives, and shifting trends among women giving birth such as advancing age and excessive pregnancy weight gain (Luthy, Malmgren, Zingheim, & Leininger, 2003; Rosenberg, Garbers, Lipkind, & Chiasson, 2005; Villar et al, 2006; Xirasagar, Lin, & Liu, 2006), as well as issues of choice (Declercq, Menacker, & Macdorman, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent analysis of over 420 000 births at three busy maternity hospitals in Dublin found that “an increasing caesarean section rate was strongly associated with a lower mortality rate in normally formed babies of normal birthweight (greater than 2500 g)”. These findings have been confirmed in studies of other large hospitals in the United Kingdom 15 . This conclusion directly contradicts the orthodoxy that caesarean section rates above 10%–15% impart no additional health benefits 16…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%