1996
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195099256.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rise of the Bourgeoisie, Demise of Empire

Abstract: The book examines the process of Westernization and social change during the 18th and 19th centuries in the Ottoman Empire. Using empirical analysis of archival documents and historical chronicles, the book questions the prevailing scholarly interpretation that Westernization leads to social change. Rather, it argues that social change precedes and contributes to the process of Westernization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Göçek presents an opposite view, arguing that the consumption of Western goods, together with the adoption of European forms in art and architecture, signified the beginning of the process of Westernization in the Ottoman Empire. 24 In a similar vein, Nora Ş eni underscores the symbolic competition over European fashion and the ambivalence of meaning in contemporary discourses criticizing the adoption of European dress by Muslim women. 25 The consumption of goods could certainly mean different things to different agents.…”
Section: T H E D I V E R S E T R a J E C T O R I E S O F O T T O M A mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…23 Göçek presents an opposite view, arguing that the consumption of Western goods, together with the adoption of European forms in art and architecture, signified the beginning of the process of Westernization in the Ottoman Empire. 24 In a similar vein, Nora Ş eni underscores the symbolic competition over European fashion and the ambivalence of meaning in contemporary discourses criticizing the adoption of European dress by Muslim women. 25 The consumption of goods could certainly mean different things to different agents.…”
Section: T H E D I V E R S E T R a J E C T O R I E S O F O T T O M A mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Fatma Göçek, members of the Ottoman elite acquired Western products through the market, gift exchanges, or confiscations. 8 Conspicuous consumption was a major form of social competition among members of the bureaucracy striving to rival their competitors in the Ottoman court, and officials indulged themselves in extravagances that included the frequent use and exhibition of Western goods to such an extent as to provoke the reaction of the state. 9 Sumptuary laws, constantly promulgated during the 18th century, were among the tools that the Ottoman state used to control this competitive symbolic arena and to redirect power toward the personage of the sultan.…”
Section: T H E D I V E R S E T R a J E C T O R I E S O F O T T O M A mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this bifurcation is evidenced in the variegated adoptions of ideas on civilization, equality, and national identity, Göçek illustrates through a survey of inheritance records how the increasing adoption of Western goods is further proof of 'the rise of the Ottoman commercial bourgeoisie'. 11 Göçek deals primarily with Istanbul, but this religious bifurcation in the rising middle class is also central for scholars of the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, particularly cities with large Christian populations, such as Beirut. As in the case of Göçek, evidence from material culture is recruited to support this phenomenon.…”
Section: Anxieties Across the Religious Dividementioning
confidence: 99%