2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02200-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risankizumab in real life: preliminary results of efficacy and safety in psoriasis during a 16-week period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
3
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
60
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients in the Italian study had undergone several biologic therapies before risankizumab, without success, which means that they represented difficult-to-treat cases, which could be the reason for a marginally higher reduction in mean PASI score in our study [11]. A similar reduction of PASI score in a real-life setting was described by Megna et al and also by Ruggiero et al, who indirectly compared risankizumab with guselkumab [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The patients in the Italian study had undergone several biologic therapies before risankizumab, without success, which means that they represented difficult-to-treat cases, which could be the reason for a marginally higher reduction in mean PASI score in our study [11]. A similar reduction of PASI score in a real-life setting was described by Megna et al and also by Ruggiero et al, who indirectly compared risankizumab with guselkumab [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For risankizumab, phase III studies (UltIMMa‐1 and UltIMMa‐2) included a total of 243 patients aged ≥ 65 years and 24 aged ≥ 75 years, without showing any overall differences compared with younger participants, 18 while a recent pooled analysis of two phase III trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2), which included 92 participants aged ≥ 65 years and 17 aged ≥ 75 years, reported a 3‐year safety profile of tildrakizumab comparable with placebo, in terms of rates of major CVEs and serious infection 21 . Even if data about real‐life‐practice are increasing, particularly for guselkumab and risankizumab, to date, real‐world studies focusing on anti‐IL‐23s in elderly patients are still lacking 15–19 . Our real‐world study showed promising results in terms of both safety and efficacy for all anti‐IL‐23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anti‐IL‐23 drugs represent the latest class of biologics approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. For guselkumab, risankizumab and tildrakizumab, promising results in terms of safety and efficacy have been shown in both clinical trials and real‐life studies 1,13–21 . However, because these are new therapies that have only recently become available, no real‐life data on elderly patients have been reported to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also presented a series of cases of scalp, hands and/or feet psoriasis, in which rizankizumab was successfully administered after finding no effects of the therapy with IL-17, IL-12/IL-23 (ustekinumab) or guselkumab [21]. The effectiveness of rizankizumab in these locations was confirmed by the observation in a larger group of patients [22]. The researchers observed only a low effect of etanercept and certolizumab pegol in reducing PSSI and PPPASI [20].…”
Section: Psoriasis Of Special Areasmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Autorzy przedstawili również serię przypadków łuszczycy skóry owłosionej głowy oraz dłoni i/lub stóp, w których po stwierdzeniu braku efektów inhibitorów IL-17, IL--12/IL-23 (ustekinumab) lub guzelkumabu zastosowano z sukcesem rizankizumab [21]. Skuteczność rizankizumabu w tych lokalizacjach potwierdziła obserwacja w większej grupie chorych [22]. Badacze zaobserwowali jedynie niewielki efekt etanerceptu i certolizumabu pegol w redukcji PSSI i PPPASI [20].…”
Section: łUszczyca Miejsc Szczególnychunclassified