2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riparian land-use impacts on bank erosion and deposition of an incised stream in north-central Iowa, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voltage outputs from the PEEP were logged at 15-second intervals and averaged every 15 minutes in this study, similar to other PEEP studies (e.g. Couperthwaite et al, 1998;Mitchell et al, 2003;Horn and Lane, 2006;Lawler, 2008;McDermott and Sherman, 2009;Zaimes and Schultz, 2015).…”
Section: Peep System Components and Operating Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The voltage outputs from the PEEP were logged at 15-second intervals and averaged every 15 minutes in this study, similar to other PEEP studies (e.g. Couperthwaite et al, 1998;Mitchell et al, 2003;Horn and Lane, 2006;Lawler, 2008;McDermott and Sherman, 2009;Zaimes and Schultz, 2015).…”
Section: Peep System Components and Operating Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riparian vegetation is used in bank stabilization, bank erosion control, restoring channel geomorphology, and habitat creation (Lyons et al 2000). In comparison with forested stream reaches, nonforest reaches typically have lower channel widths, and this has been observed in multiple geographic locations including the Piedmont region of the United States (Zimmerman et al 1967;Hession et al 2003;Sweeney et al 2004;McBride et al 2008), the Midwestern USA (Trimble 1997;Zaimes and Schultz 2015), New Zealand (Davies-Colley 1997;Quinn et al 1997), and the UK (Murgatroyd and Ternan 1983). Channel incision and reduction of overall stream habitat (i.e., benthic surface area) have generally been viewed as negative consequences of channel narrowing with deforestation in naturally forested regions (Sweeney et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most assessments of the impact of riparian vegetation on channel geomorphology have focused on regions outside the Canadian Prairies with higher topographic gradients, where native vegetation was primarily forest, and in regions where rainfall rather than snowmelt-driven runoff events are common (Lyons et al 2000;Stewart et al 2010). In other temperate regions, freeze-thaw cycles have been observed to increase potential for soil losses through bank failure or loosening of material, with highest rates frequently being observed under riparian forest (Zaimes and Schultz 2015). Although riparian soils on the prairies tend to remain frozen throughout the winter (Satchithanantham et al 2017), bank thaw over the course of snowmelt and with inundation of flooded areas may be important processes defining bank erosion potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They act as connectors between organisms and habitats (Smith and Finch, 2013) and influence the environmental quality of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Pusey and Arthington, 2003). They also play an essential role in mitigating the effects of flooding and carry out geomorphological functions such as stabilising sediments and preventing the erosion of riverbanks (Bennett and Simon, 2004;Stone et al, 2013;Zaimes and Schultz, 2015). However, riparian vegetation is in a general state of degradation because of various human activities (Suárez et al, 2002), which, in certain cases, are threatening the existence and sustainability of riparian vegetation and the services it offers (Tockner et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%