1982
DOI: 10.1017/s0252921100082464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rings of Uranus: A Review of Occultation Results

Abstract: (ii) the Voyager encounter in 1986, and (iii) the Space Telescope.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only parameters not determined well from the three sets of data were the gravity coefficient J2 and the pole location. Because the closest approach to Uranus was at about 4 R u, only a rough determination could be obtained from Voyager ; thus in our analysis we used the previously published gravity field and pole from the precession of eccentric rings [Elliot, 1982;Nicholson et al, 1982]. A provision was included to consider the effect of the error in J2 and the pole location on the covariance matrix without estimating those three parameters ("consider option").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only parameters not determined well from the three sets of data were the gravity coefficient J2 and the pole location. Because the closest approach to Uranus was at about 4 R u, only a rough determination could be obtained from Voyager ; thus in our analysis we used the previously published gravity field and pole from the precession of eccentric rings [Elliot, 1982;Nicholson et al, 1982]. A provision was included to consider the effect of the error in J2 and the pole location on the covariance matrix without estimating those three parameters ("consider option").…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A provision was included to consider the effect of the error in J2 and the pole location on the covariance matrix without estimating those three parameters ("consider option"). We used standard errors as given by Elliot [-1982] for the gravity field and pole location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%