2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, data from EMBRACE1 available in a recent publication (20) with an indirect comparison of intracavitary and IC/IS implants in an international study showed increased target dose and lower bladder and rectal dose for the hybrid approach similar to our findings. They also demonstrated a similar HR-CTV size of 35 cc for benefit for the hybrid approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultimately, data from EMBRACE1 available in a recent publication (20) with an indirect comparison of intracavitary and IC/IS implants in an international study showed increased target dose and lower bladder and rectal dose for the hybrid approach similar to our findings. They also demonstrated a similar HR-CTV size of 35 cc for benefit for the hybrid approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When splitting the patient data into groups based on tumor volume, the local control benefit was more obviously seen in the patient group with HR-CTV volume $35 cc, which was 4.1% ( p 5 0.0013) as compared with 0.8% increase of local control rate for the group with HR-CTV volume less than 35 cc. The cutoff value 35 cc was chosen to follow the same setup in a previous study (20). In terms of RR, using needles significantly improved local control rate in both groups with RR $ 2.0 and RR !…”
Section: Hr-ctv Coverage and Local Control Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the addition of interstitial component escalated target coverage without increasing doses to OARs, and enhanced a therapeutic window by an average of 4 to 8 Gy EQD 2 [4,5,25]. This has been confirmed recently in the large prospective trial EMBRACE I, where for a HR-CTV volume of 60 cm 3 , which is comparable to the patients included in our study, mean HR-CTV D90% was 5.4 Gy (95% CI: 2.7-8.1) higher for ovoids-IC/IS compared with ovoids-IC centers, and 8.9 Gy (95% CI: 7.0-10.7) higher for ring-IC/IS compared with ring-IC centers [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the retroEMBRACE study, LC improved by 10% in patients with CTV ≥ 30 cc in the IS/IC group [5]. The EBRACE I study has shown that IS/ICBT was performed in 91% of patients with parametrium involvement [19]. Jastaniyah et al reported that IS/ICBT was frequently used in patients with large tumor, tumor with poor response or tumor involvement to distal parametrium, or pelvic wall in MRI at the time of brachytherapy [20].…”
Section: Ctv -Clinical Target Volume Hr -High-risk Icbt -Intracavitmentioning
confidence: 99%