2001
DOI: 10.1039/b102380m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring size effects in the C2–C6 biradical cyclisation of enyne–allenes and the relevance for neocarzinostatin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast, then, to the Bergman cycloaromatization of an enediyne, 30 which generates a diradical p -benzyne intermediate that is incapable of further closure owing to the instability of what would be a “Dewar benzyne” product. 31 The intramolecular HDDA is also in contrast with the Myers-Saito 32 and Schmittel 33 cycloaromatizations of enyne-allenes, which lead to α,3-didehydrotoluene and extracyclic fulvenoid diradical intermediates, respectively, 31e,34 and with the cycloaromatization of the enyne-cumulene neocarzinostatin chromophore, which leads to a 1,5-didehydroindene. 35 In none of these other cases are the radical centers able to react (intramolecularly) with one another to form a new bond (and ring): geometric constraints prevent such a closure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast, then, to the Bergman cycloaromatization of an enediyne, 30 which generates a diradical p -benzyne intermediate that is incapable of further closure owing to the instability of what would be a “Dewar benzyne” product. 31 The intramolecular HDDA is also in contrast with the Myers-Saito 32 and Schmittel 33 cycloaromatizations of enyne-allenes, which lead to α,3-didehydrotoluene and extracyclic fulvenoid diradical intermediates, respectively, 31e,34 and with the cycloaromatization of the enyne-cumulene neocarzinostatin chromophore, which leads to a 1,5-didehydroindene. 35 In none of these other cases are the radical centers able to react (intramolecularly) with one another to form a new bond (and ring): geometric constraints prevent such a closure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon exchange of the cyclopentene by a cyclohexene ( n = 2) or cycloheptene ( n = 3), a preference for the C 2 –C 6 cyclization mode is seen, because the marginal ring strain differences cannot override anymore the effect of the phenyl group at the alkyne terminus. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the activation barrier of the C 2 –C 6 cyclization of cyclopent‐enyne–allene 62 ( n = 1; R 1 = R 2 = H) is about the same as that of the C 2 –C 7 mode (Δ G ‡ = 30.3 and 30.9 kcal mol ‐1 , respectively) . However, with increasing ring size, the C 2 –C 6 activation barrier becomes decisively lower (for n = 2: 24.2 versus 28.1 kcal mol ‐1 ; for n = 3: 22.2 versus 26.1 kcal mol ‐1 ).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Schmittel (C2–c6) Cyclizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For neocarzinostatin (13A) and related structures, conversion of the natural product to the enyne allene intermediate increases the ring strain for the triggered species to 15 kcal/mol above the σ, π-diradical energy [201]. Cycloaromatization can occur to a 2,6-or 2,7-diradical; the latter regioselectivity is believed to be favored for systems with a small, fused cyclopentane ring [202]. In the case of the C 10 enediynes, cleavage of the trisulfide linkage with a reductant, such as glutathione, causes a Michael addition to a constraining cyclohexenone ring (Fig.…”
Section: Structural Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%