DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036530781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ring resonator-based broadband photonic beam former for phased array antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 it can be noticed that the suppression in the OSBF stopbands varies across frequency. This can be attributed to the group index change in the bends of the ORR included in one of the interferometer arms of the filter [15,16]. Nonetheless, the tunability of the OSBF allowed to reconfigure the response in such a way to obtain maximum suppression over the undesired stopband, that is, between 10.7 GHz and 12.75 GHz below the carrier frequency (Fig.…”
Section: A Filter Response and Wavelength Settings For Ossb-fc Operamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4 it can be noticed that the suppression in the OSBF stopbands varies across frequency. This can be attributed to the group index change in the bends of the ORR included in one of the interferometer arms of the filter [15,16]. Nonetheless, the tunability of the OSBF allowed to reconfigure the response in such a way to obtain maximum suppression over the undesired stopband, that is, between 10.7 GHz and 12.75 GHz below the carrier frequency (Fig.…”
Section: A Filter Response and Wavelength Settings For Ossb-fc Operamentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this paper we look at an automatic tuning procedure for one branch of the OBFN subsystem. The traditional approach to automatically tune one branch of the photonic beamformer is to use a nonlinear optimization algorithm that minimizes a performance metric [4,Sec. 6].…”
Section: A Automatic Tuning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An OBFN simulation based on the same physical models as in [28] will be used in this section, with the following differences: 1) the implementation is done in C++; 2) ORR properties are equal for each ORR; 3) heater voltages with offset and crosstalk [27,Appendix B] have been implemented; 4) a small region outside the bandwidth of interest has a desired group delay of 0; 5) an 8 × 1 OBFN with 12 ORRs is considered; 6) the standard deviation of the measurement noise was set to 7.5 · 10 −3 . The input of the simulation is the normalized heater voltage for each ORR, and the output is the corresponding mean square error of the difference between OBFN path group delays and desired delays.…”
Section: Tuning Of An Optical Beam-forming Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%