1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01440582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rime length, stress, and association domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phonetic studies reported in Duanmu (1993Duanmu ( , 1994b showed that the average syllable durations of Mandarin and Shanghai are 215 ms and 162 ms, respectively, and he argued that this supports the position that Mandarin syllables have one extra X slot than Shanghai syllables. In terms of rime complexity, Duanmu (1993Duanmu ( , 1994a argued that M-languages such as Mandarin and Cantonese have coda contrasts and diphthongs while S-languages like Shanghai and Suzhou have no coda contrasts or diphthongs, and all their rimes are in the form of CV, where the vowel is either oral, 20 An anonymous reviewer questioned whether the analysis provided here can truly be considered an improvement over Chen's elegant statements as it requires 14 ranked constraints and unconventional definitions of faithfulness constraints. I believe that the validity of a theory depends not on its internal complexity but on how well its predictions fit with data.…”
Section: Case Study-tangximentioning
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Phonetic studies reported in Duanmu (1993Duanmu ( , 1994b showed that the average syllable durations of Mandarin and Shanghai are 215 ms and 162 ms, respectively, and he argued that this supports the position that Mandarin syllables have one extra X slot than Shanghai syllables. In terms of rime complexity, Duanmu (1993Duanmu ( , 1994a argued that M-languages such as Mandarin and Cantonese have coda contrasts and diphthongs while S-languages like Shanghai and Suzhou have no coda contrasts or diphthongs, and all their rimes are in the form of CV, where the vowel is either oral, 20 An anonymous reviewer questioned whether the analysis provided here can truly be considered an improvement over Chen's elegant statements as it requires 14 ranked constraints and unconventional definitions of faithfulness constraints. I believe that the validity of a theory depends not on its internal complexity but on how well its predictions fit with data.…”
Section: Case Study-tangximentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, according to Duanmu (1993), the difference between tone extension and paradigmatic substitution also receives a durational account, but the account is couched in the bimoraic versus monomoraic distinction between the rimes of two types of languages, not the initial versus final difference reflected in the directionalities of the two types of processes. In other words, the relation between the sandhi behavior and the durational property incurred by the position of the prominent syllable is entirely accidental in the Duanmu (1993) account: it just so happens that S-languages like Shanghai have initial prominence and M-languages like Mandarin have final prominence; the fact that tone extension occurs in S-languages and paradigmatic tone change occurs in M-languages is due to the monomoracity of S-language rimes and the bimoraicity of M-language rimes, not the durational difference between initial and final syllables.…”
Section: Case Study-tangximentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some analyses account for tone doubling with a rule or constraint requiring binary tone association (Hyman and Ngunga 1994;Odden 1998b;Bickmore 1999), while others induce general spreading, but constrain it to apply minimally (Cassimjee and Kisseberth 1998). Foot-based spreading is a popular alternative, and has been proposed for several languages including Shanghai and Lhasa Tibetan (Duanmu 1992(Duanmu , 1993, Sukuma (Bradshaw 1998), Lamba (Bickmore 2003;de Lacy 2001), N. Karanga Shona (Topintzi 2003), Yabem (Hansson 2004), Bambara (Leben 2003;Weidman and Rose 2006) and Kera (Pearce 2006). Whichever mechanism induces binary spreading, binarity is best defined in terms of moras.…”
Section: Verbs With Light Syllables: H-h and H-lmentioning
confidence: 99%