Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3318216.3363317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rilod

Abstract: Object detection models shipped with camera-equipped edge devices cannot cover the objects of interest for every user. Therefore, the incremental learning capability is a critical feature for a robust and personalized object detection system that many applications would rely on. In this paper, we present an efficient yet practical system, RILOD, to incrementally train an existing object detection model such that it can detect new object classes without losing its capability to detect old classes. The key compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the class-incremental scenario, the model learns an increasing number of new classes using new data over time. An example of this scenario is learning new household objects for service robotics [31].…”
Section: Continual Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the class-incremental scenario, the model learns an increasing number of new classes using new data over time. An example of this scenario is learning new household objects for service robotics [31].…”
Section: Continual Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-phase setting. Table 1 shows that our method outperforms previous approaches such as LWF [29], RILOD [24], SID [39], and ERD [10] using GFLv1 [27], including CL-DETR [33]. Importantly, we achieved a 0.5% increase in AP for the 70+10 scenario and 1.0% for the 40+40 scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Table 2 shows that our method, which utilizes synthetic image-based training, surprisingly outperforms other approaches significantly in multi-phase scenarios. Despite using different baselines like [10,24,39], it is evident that our method maintains consistent performance. We achieve 8.7% and 5.8% gains in AP for the 40+10+10+10+10 and 40+20+20 scenarios, respectively, compared to CL-DETR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations