The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Oxford Music Online 2001
DOI: 10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.article.23471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riisager, Knudåge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important restriction is the mixing with others states that cannot be avoided if the local density of states is too high. This limits the occurence of halos in excited states, the estimates in [22] for an excitation energy E * use a level distance of D 0 exp(−2 √ aE * ) (with D 0 = 7 MeV and a = A/7.5 MeV) and conclude that s-wave neutron halo states should have binding energy B < 270 keV (A/Z) 2 exp(−4 √ aE * ) and that the restriction for p-waves is Z < 0.44A 4/3 exp(−2 √ aE * ). For now, the main inference from these estimates is that nuclear halos will predominantly occur in ground states or at low excitation energy and therefore is a dripline phenomenon.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important restriction is the mixing with others states that cannot be avoided if the local density of states is too high. This limits the occurence of halos in excited states, the estimates in [22] for an excitation energy E * use a level distance of D 0 exp(−2 √ aE * ) (with D 0 = 7 MeV and a = A/7.5 MeV) and conclude that s-wave neutron halo states should have binding energy B < 270 keV (A/Z) 2 exp(−4 √ aE * ) and that the restriction for p-waves is Z < 0.44A 4/3 exp(−2 √ aE * ). For now, the main inference from these estimates is that nuclear halos will predominantly occur in ground states or at low excitation energy and therefore is a dripline phenomenon.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, being so high up in the continuum implies that there will be plenty of states with which they can mix. They can therefore be expected to behave in close analogy to halo states at high excitation energy that are known [50] to mix with other states rather than to remain unperturbed. In both cases, there is no quantum number or symmetry that preserves the topology or clustering of the structure.…”
Section: Nuclear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the core+xn system is unbound for x = 1, 3, 5, .. and bound for x = 2, 4 (and even higher). It has even been suggested that this type of structure may appear also for low masses beyond the dripline [53]. However, one would expect the internal structure of the states to rearrange as neutrons are added.…”
Section: Nuclear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear structures can vary from spherical mean-field properties, over collective deformations and a variety of other correlations, to bound nuclear clusters each in (almost) inert subsystems [7,[14][15][16]. Very crudely, we can say that nuclei around beta-stability are fairly well described by self-consistent mean-field calculations while approach to the nucleon driplines produces two-and three-body halo structures [17,18]. For excited states at energies close to threshold for cluster separation, the corresponding clusterization is strongly favored [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%