2012
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xxxix-b5-181-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigorous Point-to-Plane Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scans

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Terrestrial laser scanning data that are acquired from multiple scan locations need to be registered before any 3D modeling and/or analysis is conducted. This paper presents a rigorous point-to-plane registration approach that minimizes the distances between two overlapping laser scans, using the General Least Squares adjustment model. The proposed approach falls under the class of fine registration and does not require any targets or tie points. Given some initial registration parameters, the propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the incoming signal diverges from the surface normal, that is, the incidence angle increases, the returned signal gets weaker, that is, it results in the deterioration of σρ. The measure of this deterioration was already formulated as the cosine of the incidence angle )(cos)(γ (Baselgia et al, 2014; Grant et al, 2012b; Hebert & Krotkov, 1992; Soudarissanane et al, 2011). On the other hand, the appropriate composition of the distance, reflectivity and incidence angle error terms in Equations () and () is the new approach in this proposed work.…”
Section: Anisotropic Point Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the incoming signal diverges from the surface normal, that is, the incidence angle increases, the returned signal gets weaker, that is, it results in the deterioration of σρ. The measure of this deterioration was already formulated as the cosine of the incidence angle )(cos)(γ (Baselgia et al, 2014; Grant et al, 2012b; Hebert & Krotkov, 1992; Soudarissanane et al, 2011). On the other hand, the appropriate composition of the distance, reflectivity and incidence angle error terms in Equations () and () is the new approach in this proposed work.…”
Section: Anisotropic Point Error Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%