In
this paper, the potential of alternative fuels to reduce preignition
in engines is primarily investigated. Two ketones (2-butanone and
3-methylbutanone), a furan (2-methylfuran), and five alcohols (ethanol,
iso-propanol, 2-butanol, iso-butanol, and 1-propanol) are compared
to three conventional fuels (RON95E0, RON95E10, and iso-octane). If
the alternative fuels can reduce preignition significantly, the efficiency
of spark-ignition engines can be potentially increased. One major
aim is to categorize the fuels in terms of preignition resistance.
Additionally, the distributions of the initial preignition kernels
are measured by high-speed luminescence imaging to analyze the reason
for preignition. Furthermore, the occurrence of measured preignition
is compared with computed ignition delay times at the pressures and
temperatures of the engine load points used to find out whether the
mixture is prone to autoignition in the bulk gas phase. This is most
likely the case for the three conventional fuels because of thermodynamically
critical gas-phase conditions. Seemingly, preignition is not induced by droplets, presumably because of an improved injector
targeting. Moreover, the preignition resistance of the alternative
fuels is significantly higher (critical intake pressure difference:
∼2 bar) compared to that of the three conventional fuels. It
can also be concluded that 2-butanone is most resistant against preignition.
Similarly, alcohols and 3-methylbutanone are highly beneficial compared
to conventional fuels. Overall, the most important fuel properties
for preignition appear to be research octane number and enthalpy of
vaporization. Apparently, ignition is caused by glow ignition at a
hot surface (spark plug) only for 2-methylfuran, iso-butanol, and
1-propanol.