Rigorous control conditions diminish treatment effects in weight loss-randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background It has not been established whether control conditions with large weight losses (WLs) diminish expected treatment effects in WL or prevention of weight gain (PWG) randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subjects/Methods We performed a meta-analysis of 239 WL/PWG RCTs that include a control group and at least one treatment group. A maximum likelihood meta-analysis framework is used in order to model and understand the relationship between treatment effects and control group outcomes. Results Under the informed model, an increase in control group WL of one kilogram corresponds with an expected shrinkage of the treatment effect by 0.309 kg [95% CI (−0.480, −0.138), p = 0.00081]; this result is robust against violations of the model assumptions. Conclusions We find that control conditions with large weight losses diminish expected treatment effects. Our investigation may be helpful to clinicians as they design future WL/PWG studies.

Effect of interdisciplinary care on weight loss: a randomised controlled trial

“…The design where all groups received the same intensity of intervention with dietary advice referring to foods in AGHE 29 may have masked our ability to show true effects. In similar highly controlled circumstances it has been argued that for every kg increase in weight loss by controls, treatment effects may be reduced by about 0.3 kg 49 .…”

The effect of nut consumption on markers of inflammation and endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

“… 27 The potential impact of control groups on underestimating intervention effects has previously been highlighted in the weight loss literature. 73 Trials aiming to explore the influence of specific foods on health outcomes must carefully consider the design of the dietary intervention and control arms and avoid increases in total energy intake which could skew results.…”

Impact of providing walnut samples in a lifestyle intervention for weight loss: a secondary analysis of the HealthTrack trial

“…In interpreting this research we also need to consider the significance of appropriate comparator groups in obesity research [ 42 , 43 ]. It has been noted that only limited treatment effects can be exposed when comparator groups involve rigorous background interventions [ 42 , 43 ]. In our case, the background diet was controlled for by a common reference to the foods listed in the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating, but more rigorous background control was achieved in the two groups receiving individualized dietary advice.…”