2016
DOI: 10.2118/180909-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigorous and Explicit Determination of Reserves and Hyperbolic Exponents in Gas-Well Decline Analysis

Abstract: Reservoir evaluation on the basis of rate-time data of gas wells producing under boundary-dominated flow (BDF) is often performed with the Arps' empirical hyperbolic decline model and associated type curves. In this study, we show that, for volumetric, single-phase, gas reservoirs produced at constant bottomhole pressure, the decline exponent, b, used in Arps' hyperbolic model can be calculated solely on the basis of fluid properties and the prevailing bottomhole specification-regardless of reservoir propertie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical models are simple, but they also are mere curve fits, whose parameters have little physical meaning and cannot be generalized. In hyperbolic DCA, for example, the exponent b is adjusted to fit production data, notwithstanding several studies that have tried to elucidate its physical meaning [18][19][20]. Another limitation of most empirical models is their inability to capture the two regimes of oil and gas production in shales that are transient-linear flow at early times and boundary-dominated flow at later times on production [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical models are simple, but they also are mere curve fits, whose parameters have little physical meaning and cannot be generalized. In hyperbolic DCA, for example, the exponent b is adjusted to fit production data, notwithstanding several studies that have tried to elucidate its physical meaning [18][19][20]. Another limitation of most empirical models is their inability to capture the two regimes of oil and gas production in shales that are transient-linear flow at early times and boundary-dominated flow at later times on production [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the transient flow period, prior to BDF, the productivity index is not constant but varies with time. Araya and Ozkan (2002) defined the transient productivity index for a gas reservoir as where the material-balance pseudotime (t a ) is defined as (Palacio et al 1993;Agarwal et al 1999;Raghavan 1993…”
Section: Identification Of the Bdf Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, its derivation implies the assumption that the bottom hole pressure is constant, so the method may fail to apply to the variable BHP case. Stumpf and Ayala (2016) deduced the analytical expression of decline index n under the constant BHP condition from the Arps' hyperbolic decline model and the relation of the pseudopressure at BHP to the pseudopressure at average reservoir pressure, and proposed a straight-line analysis method for determining reserves by using the production data within the hyperbolic window (or during early BDF). The inconvenient type-curve matching, however, is ineluctable for locating the start and end of the hyperbolic window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%