1994
DOI: 10.2307/256610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigidity in Decision Behaviors: A Within-Subject Test of Information Acquisition Using Strategic and Financial Informational Cues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We can reconcile the differences between these archival findings and those of Hirst and Hopkins (1998) since managing investments is a core activity for insurance companies, but is a noncore activity for electronics firms. Thus, Hirst and Hopkins' (1998) results may illustrate a situation where experts' valuation models, which generally provide accurate judgments, can be dysfunctional (Frensch and Sternberg 1989;Rosman et al 1994;Bonner et al 1996). Additionally, recent experimental research suggests the effects of different presentations may be reduced or eliminated as analysts become more familiar with the new formats (Maines et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can reconcile the differences between these archival findings and those of Hirst and Hopkins (1998) since managing investments is a core activity for insurance companies, but is a noncore activity for electronics firms. Thus, Hirst and Hopkins' (1998) results may illustrate a situation where experts' valuation models, which generally provide accurate judgments, can be dysfunctional (Frensch and Sternberg 1989;Rosman et al 1994;Bonner et al 1996). Additionally, recent experimental research suggests the effects of different presentations may be reduced or eliminated as analysts become more familiar with the new formats (Maines et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the firm ages, knowledge about technology and markets becomes increasingly differentiated and individuals become identified and specialized with routines within the different knowledge bases. The managers with different knowledge sets differ in the form of information they use to make decisions and in their perceptions of how skills might transfer to other product applications (Rosman et al ., ; Stimpert and Duhaime, ).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forms of know‐how we assess are based on routines for making/designing a product (which we define as technology knowledge) and routines for selling/marketing the product (which we call marketing knowledge). The different routines used over time by individuals in technology and marketing lead to different espoused theories of action (Argyris and Schon, ), different ways of framing information (Dutton and Jackson, ; Ireland et al ., ), and reliance on different information searches (Rosman, Lubatkin, and O'Neill, ). Our work is based on the premise that technology knowledge and market knowledge will each exert a different influence on a firm's new product‐market choices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans les années 1990, quelques chercheurs commençaient à utiliser avec succès une approche appelée Thinking Aloud pour étudier la résolution de problème (Ericcson et Simon, 1993;Winburg, 1991*), la compréhension de texte (Kukan et Beck, 1997;Pressley et Afflerbach, 1995*) ou la prise de décision (Rosman, Lubatkin et O'Neill, 1994*). Ce moyen nous a semblé intéressant et nous l'avons adapté pour utilisation muséale.…”
Section: Adaptation D'un Moyen Récentunclassified