2009
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigid‐plastic models for the seismic design and assessment of steel framed structures

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the applicability of response history analysis based on rigidplastic models for the seismic assessment and design of steel buildings. The rigid-plastic force-deformation relationship as applied in steel moment-resisting frames is re-examined and new rigid-plastic models are developed for concentrically braced frames and dual structural systems consisting of moment-resisting frames coupled with braced systems. This paper demonstrates that such rigid-plastic models are able to predict glo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…larger initial displacements leading to earlier hinge formation for ξ = 1 than 5%). However, the tendency of very stiff structures with negligible damping and significant strength degradation to undergo oscillations around zero drifts, as opposed to the marked unsymmetrical ratcheting response observed for the same structures for relatively mild values of additional energy dissipation , may contribute towards 5%‐damped structures experiencing consistently larger drifts and plastic damage levels. These phenomena are further manifested in the lower IMs at which the mean plasticity rises above zero at ξ = 5 than at 1% for both NF and FF records and in wider 95% CIs for the imperfect structure (Figures and ).…”
Section: Response‐history and Multiple Stripe Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…larger initial displacements leading to earlier hinge formation for ξ = 1 than 5%). However, the tendency of very stiff structures with negligible damping and significant strength degradation to undergo oscillations around zero drifts, as opposed to the marked unsymmetrical ratcheting response observed for the same structures for relatively mild values of additional energy dissipation , may contribute towards 5%‐damped structures experiencing consistently larger drifts and plastic damage levels. These phenomena are further manifested in the lower IMs at which the mean plasticity rises above zero at ξ = 5 than at 1% for both NF and FF records and in wider 95% CIs for the imperfect structure (Figures and ).…”
Section: Response‐history and Multiple Stripe Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 6-storey building was designed and modelled by Málaga-Chuquitaype et al [28] and has an initial period of T = 1.1 seconds and a mass of 1085350 kg while the two-storey frame has an initial period of T = 0.22 second (obtained from Eigenvalue analysis) and a mass of 43100 kg. The slenderness of the first-storey braces areλ = 1.1 for the 6-storey building andλ = 1.3 for the 2-storey frame.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response to El Centro record with T m = 0.986 seconds is considered as an example. The record was scaled to have a P GA over acceleration at yield equal to 3, which corresponds to Root Mean Squared Accelerations of a RM S = 2.64g and a RM S = 0.93g for the 6-storey and 2-storey buildings, respectively [28].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, rigid-plastic approximations, largely diffused in earthquake engineering, give rise to simplified procedures [5], although its implementation within conventional stiffness-based computer methods, the instantaneous jump of stiffness between zero and infinite. The model examined in this paper, together with those developed for rigid-plastic bending frames, overcomes this last limit [6,7]. In literature, in fact, constitutive models for rigid-plastic bending frames are diffused, differently from the shear constitutive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%