2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-8641(02)00075-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigid hereditarily indecomposable continua

Abstract: We answer a question of Yohe by showing that there exists a family of continuum many topologically different hereditarily indecomposable Cantor manifolds without any non-trivial weakly infinite-dimensional subcon-tinua. This family may consist either of compacta containing one-dimensional subsets or of compacta containing no weakly infinite-dimensional subsets of positive dimension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , the existence of such a family follows, for example, from the following lemma proved by M. Reńska in [18]: for every m-dimensional HI continuum K there exists an HI m-dimensional Cantor manifold M such that K is not embeddable into M . Indeed, let K and M be two mdimensional Cantor manifolds such that K does not embed in M and let a 1 , a 2 , .…”
Section: Lemma For Every M ∈ N There Exists An Infinite Family Of Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. , the existence of such a family follows, for example, from the following lemma proved by M. Reńska in [18]: for every m-dimensional HI continuum K there exists an HI m-dimensional Cantor manifold M such that K is not embeddable into M . Indeed, let K and M be two mdimensional Cantor manifolds such that K does not embed in M and let a 1 , a 2 , .…”
Section: Lemma For Every M ∈ N There Exists An Infinite Family Of Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] H. Cook gave an example of a rigid, 1-dimensional, HI continuum. Recently M. Reńska [18] constructed, for every m ∈ N, an HI rigid m-dimensional Cantor manifold. The main goal of this paper is to prove the following theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A metric Cook continuum must have dimension ≤ 2 (Maćkowiak [38]), and if it is hereditarily indecomposable, then it must be one-dimensional (Krzempek [32]). On the other hand, several authors investigated rigidity properties of higher-dimensional continua (J.J. Charatonik [8], M. Reńska [45], E. Pol [40][41][42][43]34], see [32] for more references). In [32] the present author constructed a metric, n-dimensional (arbitrary n > 1), hereditarily indecomposable continuum no two of whose disjoint n-dimensional subcontinua are homeomorphic, but he was not able to ensure that the continuum be Anderson-Choquet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%