1991
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90050-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rigid and flexible joint modelling in multibody dynamics using finite elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that the results obtained using 40 elements are almost identical. This example shows that the solution obtained with the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation is consistent with the law of physics even though this is a problem of large deformations simulated using a relatively small number of elements (12).…”
Section: Free Falling Pendulummentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It is interesting to note that the results obtained using 40 elements are almost identical. This example shows that the solution obtained with the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation is consistent with the law of physics even though this is a problem of large deformations simulated using a relatively small number of elements (12).…”
Section: Free Falling Pendulummentioning
confidence: 63%
“…By identifying the configuration space underlying the geometrically exact beam theory as nonlinear, differentiable manifold with Lie group structure and by pointing out important algorithmic consequences resulting from the nonadditivity and non-commutativity of the associated group elements, the original work by Simo [132] and the subse-quent work by Simo and Vu-Quoc [134] laid the foundation for abundant research work on this topic in the following years. The static beam theory [132,134] has been extended to dynamics by Cardona and Geradin [34,35] and by Simo and Vu-Quoc [135]. The contributions of Kondoh et al [88], Dvorkin et al [50] as well as Iura and Atluri [78] can be regarded as further pioneering works in this field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the only available class is the derived class Jacobian, for the calculation of the constraint Jacobian matrices required in the Lagrange multipliers technique that we have chosen to use to couple the algebraic constraint equations with the differential equations of motion of the (Cardona et al, 1991) (Ibrahimbegovic et al, 2000). The incorporation of the constraints via the Lagrange multiplier technique is straightforward, as the inertially-based degrees of freedom of the beam components, which embody both the rigid and deformation motions, are kinematically of the same sense as the physical coordinates of rigid body components.…”
Section: Figure 11 Joint Class Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%