1992
DOI: 10.1515/tlir.1992.9.4.313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rightward Floating Quantifiers Float to the Left

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other takes all to be an adjoined adverbial element that has the special property that the constituent it adjoins to must contain a trace (Klein 1976, Williams 1980, Kayne 1984:chap. 4, Dowty and Brodie 1984, Miyagawa 1989, Doetjes 1992, Baltin 1995, Torrego 1996, Bobaljik 1995, Morzycki 1998.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other takes all to be an adjoined adverbial element that has the special property that the constituent it adjoins to must contain a trace (Klein 1976, Williams 1980, Kayne 1984:chap. 4, Dowty and Brodie 1984, Miyagawa 1989, Doetjes 1992, Baltin 1995, Torrego 1996, Bobaljik 1995, Morzycki 1998.…”
Section: Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, Dowty and Brodie 1984, Doetjes 1992, Baltin 1995, Torrego 1996, Bobaljik 1995, Morzycki 1998 I assume that observations about wh-quantifier float could not form part of the primary linguistic data. Since I first began working on the topic four or five years ago, I have not come across a single example in spontaneous use.…”
Section: ā -Movement A-movement and Quantifier Floatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the above approach, Huang's generalization covers the data in (34) nicely: the complement of cît in (34a) is an NP, while the complement of cît in (34b) is a modifier (perhaps in a QP, see Doetjes 1997). The argument made by Heycock (1995) against Huang's generalization of the data in (36) is based on its incompatibility with the subject-internal trace hypothesis.…”
Section: Other Characteristics Of Quantity Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Un des arguments les plus importants pour l'hypothèse que le sujet préverbal se déplace de sa position de base dans le domaine lexical (VP) vers une position dans le domaine flexionnel IP est en effet la distribution des quantificateurs flottants comme tous (cf. entre autres Kayne 1975 ;Déprez 1990 ;Koopman et Sportiche 1991 ;McCloskey 1997 ;Doetjes 1992). Les exemples suivants montrent que le quantificateur tous, qui précède normalement le groupe nominal auquel il se rattache, peut apparaître entre l'auxiliaire et le participe, entre le verbe modal et l'infinitif ou entre le verbe copule et l'attribut s'il porte sur le sujet préverbal nominal (9), mais pas sur l'objet nominal (10).…”
Section: La Distribution Du Quantificateur Flottant Tousunclassified