2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/989286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Visual Field Attentional Bias in Reading in Children and Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sié roff et al (2012) expanded on Kinsbourne, 1970 theory and proposed that distribution of attentional resources during this preparatory phase might be influenced by hemispheric activation. Riva and Sié roff (2010) have provided arguments for that by showing that a distractor deteriorates the performance more significantly when it is presented before the word than simultaneously for RVF as well as LVF words. The RVF attentional bias occurring during the preparatory phase before word presentation is also compatible with the larger visual half field differences observed with bilateral than with unilateral presentation (Boles, 1987;Boles, 1990;Hunter & Brysbaert, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sié roff et al (2012) expanded on Kinsbourne, 1970 theory and proposed that distribution of attentional resources during this preparatory phase might be influenced by hemispheric activation. Riva and Sié roff (2010) have provided arguments for that by showing that a distractor deteriorates the performance more significantly when it is presented before the word than simultaneously for RVF as well as LVF words. The RVF attentional bias occurring during the preparatory phase before word presentation is also compatible with the larger visual half field differences observed with bilateral than with unilateral presentation (Boles, 1987;Boles, 1990;Hunter & Brysbaert, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%