2019 20th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies (PDCAT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/pdcat46702.2019.00072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Ventricle Segmentation of Cine MRI Using Residual U-net Convolutinal Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, we also compare with the papers using various traditional expansion convolution (such as the convolution kernel is 3*3, 5*5, and 7*7) methods and the improved methods based on U‐net. For example, the classic medical image segmentation method U‐net, our inspiration paper Residual U‐net 34 . There are also methods that perform well in right ventricular segmentation data sets, such as CMIC, 6 SBIA, 7 Inception CNN, 35 Dilated CNN, 36 DIN, 33 and NTUST 8…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, we also compare with the papers using various traditional expansion convolution (such as the convolution kernel is 3*3, 5*5, and 7*7) methods and the improved methods based on U‐net. For example, the classic medical image segmentation method U‐net, our inspiration paper Residual U‐net 34 . There are also methods that perform well in right ventricular segmentation data sets, such as CMIC, 6 SBIA, 7 Inception CNN, 35 Dilated CNN, 36 DIN, 33 and NTUST 8…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the classic medical image segmentation method U-net, our inspiration paper Residual U-net. 34 There are also methods that perform well in right ventricular segmentation data sets, such as CMIC, 6 SBIA, 7 Inception CNN, 35 Dilated CNN, 36 DIN, 33 and NTUST. 8 From Tables 5 and 6, we can see the superiority of U-snake's method.…”
Section: Comparison Of Segmentation Results With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%