2022
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right temporal degeneration and socioemotional semantics: semantic behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia

Abstract: Focal anterior temporal lobe (ATL) degeneration often preferentially affects the left or right hemisphere. While patients with left-predominant ATL (lATL) atrophy show severe anomia and verbal semantic deficits and meet criteria for semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) and semantic dementia, patients with early right ATL (rATL) atrophy are more difficult to diagnose as their symptoms are less well understood. Focal rATL atrophy is associated with prominent emotional and behavioral changes, and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
77
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empathy may, for example, be misplaced and/or caricatured rather than blunted (20). Certain features such as religiosity, musicophilia, obsessions around puzzles, colors or time-keeping, somatising and other odd (sometimes synaesthetic) sensory experiences, while still quite sketchily described, appear to be quite specific for RTLA set against other cases of bvFTD or svPPA (4)(5)(6)(7)(21)(22)(23). Moreover, along with more pervasive disturbances of affect, humor, social awareness, pain sensibility, appetite and circadian rhythms, these behavioral changes often occur early, even well before the onset of cognitive deficits such as prosopagnosia (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Is a New Syndromic Category Of Rtla Justified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Empathy may, for example, be misplaced and/or caricatured rather than blunted (20). Certain features such as religiosity, musicophilia, obsessions around puzzles, colors or time-keeping, somatising and other odd (sometimes synaesthetic) sensory experiences, while still quite sketchily described, appear to be quite specific for RTLA set against other cases of bvFTD or svPPA (4)(5)(6)(7)(21)(22)(23). Moreover, along with more pervasive disturbances of affect, humor, social awareness, pain sensibility, appetite and circadian rhythms, these behavioral changes often occur early, even well before the onset of cognitive deficits such as prosopagnosia (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Is a New Syndromic Category Of Rtla Justified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinically significant way-finding difficulty that sometimes accompanies RTLA superficially resembles the topographical disorientation of Alzheimer's disease but may reflect impaired recognition of topographical landmarks, potentially also encompassing ‘landmark' events in patients' personal timelines ( 9 ). Based on a detailed clinical, neuropsychological, neuroanatomical, neuropathological and genetic analysis of 46 cases, Younes et al ( 4 ) have recently proposed that this syndrome be designated “semantic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia”, with core diagnostic criteria of loss of empathy, difficulty identifying familiar people and complex compulsions or mental rigidity ( 4 ).…”
Section: Is a New Syndromic Category Of Rtla Justified?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The right temporal variant of FTD (rtvFTD), a rarer clinical phenotype, originally considered a right variant of svFTD, has distinct clinical features and predominantly right hemisphere involvement. Patients with rtvFTD exhibit early behavioral symptoms, particularly empathy deficits and psychiatric disorders ( Ulugut Erkoyun et al, 2020 ), but the diagnosis is challenging, and patients are often misdiagnosed as behavioral variant of FTD (bvFTD; Younes et al, 2022 ). A motor neuron involvement is rare in svFTD, but it has been found in up to 28% of rtvFTD cases in a recent neuropathological cohort ( Ulugut et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%