2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01857.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right‐Sided Free Wall Accessory Pathway Refractory to Conventional Catheter Ablation: Lessons From 3‐Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping

Abstract: RFW APs resistant to conventional catheter ablation might be due to unique anatomic AP features such as more epicardial course at the annulus level with atrial insertion distant from the tricuspid annulus. Electroanatomic mapping is helpful to accurately localize the atrial insertion sites of these APs and facilitates catheter ablation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several reasons for the lower success rate. In contrast to the mitral annulus, the tricuspid ring is larger and less complete which allows APs to bridge these gaps . Catheter stability, especially at the superior part of the tricuspid ring valve, might be difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons for the lower success rate. In contrast to the mitral annulus, the tricuspid ring is larger and less complete which allows APs to bridge these gaps . Catheter stability, especially at the superior part of the tricuspid ring valve, might be difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray exposure time was lower in the group that concomitantly used EAM 13 . A group of 11 patients with accessory bundles on the right lateral wall who underwent unsuccessful ablation fluoroscopy then underwent a new EAM procedure, which was successful in each case 14 . Nine pregnant patients with supraventricular tachycardias that were not controlled through medication were ablated using EAM and minimal fluoroscopy time; the patients did not have recurrences following the procedure 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case demonstrates that in patients with a left‐side AP, which is difficult to ablate because of a possible epicardial course, an approach targeting the atrial insertion site can be successful. This technique is analogous to that described for patients with failed right‐side ablations due to probable epicardial APs 10 . Since epicardial pathways on the left side can often be mapped and ablated by placing the ablation catheter in the coronary sinus or the aortic cusps, this approach may not be needed often 11,12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is analogous to that described for patients with failed right-side ablations due to probable epicardial APs. 10 Since epicardial pathways on the left side can often be mapped and ablated by placing the ablation catheter in the coronary sinus or the aortic cusps, this approach may not be needed often. 11,12 However, in those cases where the standard mapping and ablation techniques are not effective, access to the aortic cusps or coronary sinus is limited or these locations pose an unacceptable risk because of close proximity to a coronary artery using this alternative approach may be a viable option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%