2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right Precordial Lead (V4R) ST-Segment Elevation is Associated With Worse Prognosis in Patients With Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
14
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with regard to our findings, this is not true for leads V3R/ V4R. Similarly, in a previous study, Barsheshet et al (12) investigated the association of proximal LAD involvement and concurrent anterior and RV MI and found no difference between two groups of patients with and without ST elevation in right precordial leads. As right precordial leads provide valuable prognostic information in patients with inferior MI, they are often recorded in this patient group (18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, with regard to our findings, this is not true for leads V3R/ V4R. Similarly, in a previous study, Barsheshet et al (12) investigated the association of proximal LAD involvement and concurrent anterior and RV MI and found no difference between two groups of patients with and without ST elevation in right precordial leads. As right precordial leads provide valuable prognostic information in patients with inferior MI, they are often recorded in this patient group (18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Also, there was a trend towards a higher rate of significant MR in patients with STE in leads V3R/V4R. Barsheshet et al (12) reported an abnormality of middle anteroseptal wall motion, detected by echocardiographic evaluations, in patients with concurrent STE in V4R. This synchrony may describe the higher rate of significant MR in our patients, which needs to be confirmed in future large studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations