2009
DOI: 10.1136/bcr.07.2008.0593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Right hemisphere dominance for understanding the intentions of others: evidence from a split-brain patient

Abstract: Understanding the actions performed by other people is a key aspect of social interaction, including in clinical settings where patients are learning from therapists and caregivers. While lesions of the left cerebral hemisphere induce praxic disorders, the hemispheric specialisation of intention understanding remains unclear. Do patients with a right hemispheric lesion understand the intentions of other people properly? The present study investigates how a split-brain patient understands the means (what) and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion has been recently supported by a study, prompted by the results of the present experiment, carried out on a split-brain patient [76]. This patient was tested in two conditions: “means inference” task and “intention inference” task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This conclusion has been recently supported by a study, prompted by the results of the present experiment, carried out on a split-brain patient [76]. This patient was tested in two conditions: “means inference” task and “intention inference” task.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Picture sequences showed successful outcomes or failures. Response times showed a double dissociation between the responding hand and the question posed to the patient (Ortigue et al, 2009a). The left hemisphere showed greater sensitivity when responding to how an action was performed and the right hemisphere to why an action was performed (did the agent intend to achieve this outcome).…”
Section: End State and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested our hypotheses among 60 participants performing a standardized motor intention inference task (Ortigue, King, Gazzaniga, Miller, & Grafton, 2009). We investigated the extent to which facilitation effects occur in response latency measures among 10 dyads in a passionate love relationship (Study 1); 10 dyads in a companionate relationship (Study 2); and 10 pairs of strangers (Study 3).…”
Section: General Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%