Abstract:Coaching as a human development methodology has been demonstrating its results for more than four decades. Even so, the level of confusion about its essence and its lack of a definitive theoretical and methodological framework has caused its effectiveness to be questioned. Although studies on coaching with neuroimaging methodologies have been developed, there is no recent evidence about the brain changes in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity during a coaching session. The present research aims to make a co… Show more
“…The study demonstrated that the coaching interventions produced an increase in these neurological indicators, signaling an improvement in the coachees' decision-making ability [140]. A subsequent study carried out by Bartolomé and colleagues [146] compared the effectiveness of directive and non-directive coaching styles in enhancing the coachee's ability to develop creative insights (i.e., divergent thinking), considered an effect of strengthening problem-solving skills. The non-directive coaching style showed greater activation of the alpha and theta bands in the right temporal region and alpha, theta, and gamma in the right parietal area.…”
Section: Neurocoaching: a Neuroscientific Approach To Coachingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The non-directive coaching style showed greater activation of the alpha and theta bands in the right temporal region and alpha, theta, and gamma in the right parietal area. Such brain activations, which are associated with processes of creative ideation [147][148][149][150], metacognition [151,152], and problem solving [153,154], provided neurophysiological evidence that coaching can enhance insight-based problem-solving skills [146].…”
Section: Neurocoaching: a Neuroscientific Approach To Coachingmentioning
Life transitions represent moments characterized by changes that can profoundly influence individual life trajectories and subjective well-being. Recently, career coaching has become an important method of helping people expand their self-awareness, facilitate personal development, and increase their performance in the school-to-work transition. Although previous studies have confirmed that one of the most important keys to the success of a coaching program is the quality of the relationship between coach and coachee, there is a lack of knowledge regarding how to objectively measure it. In this pilot study, we adopted a neuroscientific approach to introduce objective measures of the relationship between coach and coachee through the phases of a coaching session. A sample of 14 university students and a professional coach participated in career-coaching sessions while their affective states were measured by recording brain (EEG) and physiological (Skin conductance) activity. Electroencephalographic indicators of valence, arousal, and engagement showed differences between session phases, highlighting the possibility of a neurophysiological measurement of relational dynamics. Our results provide initial evidence that neurophysiological activity can be considered a way to understand differences in the coach-coachee relationship, thereby providing information on the effectiveness of coaching interventions and facilitating a better life transition from school to work.
“…The study demonstrated that the coaching interventions produced an increase in these neurological indicators, signaling an improvement in the coachees' decision-making ability [140]. A subsequent study carried out by Bartolomé and colleagues [146] compared the effectiveness of directive and non-directive coaching styles in enhancing the coachee's ability to develop creative insights (i.e., divergent thinking), considered an effect of strengthening problem-solving skills. The non-directive coaching style showed greater activation of the alpha and theta bands in the right temporal region and alpha, theta, and gamma in the right parietal area.…”
Section: Neurocoaching: a Neuroscientific Approach To Coachingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The non-directive coaching style showed greater activation of the alpha and theta bands in the right temporal region and alpha, theta, and gamma in the right parietal area. Such brain activations, which are associated with processes of creative ideation [147][148][149][150], metacognition [151,152], and problem solving [153,154], provided neurophysiological evidence that coaching can enhance insight-based problem-solving skills [146].…”
Section: Neurocoaching: a Neuroscientific Approach To Coachingmentioning
Life transitions represent moments characterized by changes that can profoundly influence individual life trajectories and subjective well-being. Recently, career coaching has become an important method of helping people expand their self-awareness, facilitate personal development, and increase their performance in the school-to-work transition. Although previous studies have confirmed that one of the most important keys to the success of a coaching program is the quality of the relationship between coach and coachee, there is a lack of knowledge regarding how to objectively measure it. In this pilot study, we adopted a neuroscientific approach to introduce objective measures of the relationship between coach and coachee through the phases of a coaching session. A sample of 14 university students and a professional coach participated in career-coaching sessions while their affective states were measured by recording brain (EEG) and physiological (Skin conductance) activity. Electroencephalographic indicators of valence, arousal, and engagement showed differences between session phases, highlighting the possibility of a neurophysiological measurement of relational dynamics. Our results provide initial evidence that neurophysiological activity can be considered a way to understand differences in the coach-coachee relationship, thereby providing information on the effectiveness of coaching interventions and facilitating a better life transition from school to work.
“…36 Interestingly, in an MRI study comparing EEG activity of nondirective coaching (as described in this article) and directive coaching (instructing and advising), nondirective coaching showed EEG activity consistent with higher generation of insights than directive coaching. 37 Examples of integration, and insight generation, in the context of lifestyle medicine include:…”
Section: Generating Potential For Changementioning
The aspiration of lifestyle medicine practitioners is a healthy population engaged daily in lifestyle behaviors that generate the vitality needed to live a good life. That said, we are aware that there is a high population prevalence of low readiness to change behavior. This article proposes that we can improve readiness to change by shifting our expert mindsets to coaching mindsets. We focus first on helping others mobilize resources that improve readiness to change, including motivation and confidence—rather than beginning with expert education and training on new skills and behaviors. We call this coaching activity tilling the (patient’s) ground, which then germinates an interest in a mindset shift from an unresolved state ( e.g., I don’t have time to exercise) to a new state ( e.g., I might feel better and be more productive, if I exercise). In a generative conversation, moving from unresolved to resolved improves confidence in behavior change. This mindset shift is called integration—connecting and integrating an unresolved state to new thoughts, ideas, or perspectives (the ah-hah experience). We use the ground zero metaphor in multiple ways, and invite readers to till their own ground, generate potential, and enable integration as role models.
“…Additional insights on the generation of creativity/insight that may occur during a coaching session can be gained with the study of non-directive coaching (Bartolome et al, 2022 ). Non-directive coaching (NDC), is a client-centered conversation oriented to reflection, wherein the coach mainly observes and listens to the client speaking, mirroring what the client says, and asking open ended questions, enhancing the client's own potential for reflection (Bartolome et al, 2022 ). When considering the neurophysiological signature of NDC, significant activation in networks of the right parieto-temporal region occurred during the generation of (creative) insights (Bartolome et al, 2022 ).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.