2020
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rifabutin Use in Staphylococcus Biofilm Infections: A Case Series

Abstract: This is a case series of 10 patients who had staphylococcal biofilm infections that were treated with adjuvant rifabutin therapy instead of rifampin therapy. In these cases, rifampin was contraindicated secondary to drug–drug interactions with the patients’ chronic medications. Rifabutin therapy was well tolerated with no side effects. As well, no patients had recurrence of their staphylococcal infections. This case series shows that rifabutin can be a beneficial adjuvant therapy in Staphylococcus biofilm infe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the second real-world case series assessing outcomes associated with use of rifabutin for staphylococcal biofilm infections. Our findings are similar to those described by Doub et al, who noted no infection recurrence among 10 patients who received rifabutin in place of rifampin for prosthetic joint infections due to drug-drug interaction concerns ( 11 ). Rifabutin was well tolerated without side effects in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To our knowledge, this is the second real-world case series assessing outcomes associated with use of rifabutin for staphylococcal biofilm infections. Our findings are similar to those described by Doub et al, who noted no infection recurrence among 10 patients who received rifabutin in place of rifampin for prosthetic joint infections due to drug-drug interaction concerns ( 11 ). Rifabutin was well tolerated without side effects in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This data attests the potent antimicrobial activity of RFB, in the free form, against S. aureus biofilms, in comparison with the antibiotics clinically used. Indeed, the comparable activity of RFB against planktonic and biofilm of Staphylococcus species was recently described in a case study by Doub J. et al [ 46 ], in which RFB was used instead of rifampin for the treatment of 10 patients with confirmed staphylococcal biofilm infections, further supporting the potential of this antibiotic against S. aureus biofilms associated infections [ 46 ]. Despite the promising therapeutic efficacy of RFB in vitro, high antibiotic doses are necessary to be administered in vivo to achieve inhibitory concentrations at the infected sites, which could lead to systemic toxicity and development of resistant strains.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Among the rifamycin class of antibiotics, rifampicin is the most commonly used, although with severe adverse side effects due to gastrointestinal intolerance or drug-drug interactions. As such, other rifamycins, such as RFB are currently being evaluated as a possible anti-biofilm therapy due to their favorable toxicity and drug interaction behavior [ 26 , 46 ]. Aiming to choose the antibiotic with higher antimicrobial activity against planktonic and biofilm MSSA strain, susceptibility tests were performed for the three selected antibiotics RFB, LEV and VCM ( Figure 1 and Supplementary Material Table S1 [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experimental data, the antibiofilm effect seems to be a class effect of all rifamycin derivatives [26,49,50]. First clinical data suggest that rifabutin is a valuable alternative to rifampin with less adverse events and less drug-drug interactions [51].…”
Section: Role Of Rifampin In Clinical Studies Involving Orthopedic Immentioning
confidence: 99%