1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02572353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Riesz summability of multiple Hermite series inL p spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to an alternative proof of the eigenfunction bounds of Karadzhov [7] and Thangavelu [13]. Our approach has the advantage that is robust enough so that it allows us to obtain the same results with x 2 replaced by potentials in a very large class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to an alternative proof of the eigenfunction bounds of Karadzhov [7] and Thangavelu [13]. Our approach has the advantage that is robust enough so that it allows us to obtain the same results with x 2 replaced by potentials in a very large class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This question has received considerable interest in the context of Riesz summability for the harmonic oscillator in the work of Thangavelu [12], [14], [13] and Karadzhov [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simplest form, these have the form t −τ − The L p spectral projection bounds for the Hermite operator were independently obtained by Thangavelu [28] and Kharazdhov [16]; see also the simplified proof in the authors's paper [19]. These bounds were essential in the proof of L p Carleman inequalities for the heat operator of Escauriaza [8] and Escauriaza and Vega [10] which yield SUCP(I) when g = I n , W = 0 and…”
Section: Sucp(ii)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The main tool used in one of the end-points of the analytic interpolation is the following restriction theorem for the projections associated to Hermite functions that was first proved by Karadzhov [21] (see also [38, the remark to Proposition 1]).…”
Section: Proof Of the Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%