Riding in the shadows: The reaction of the British print media to Chris Froome’s victory in the 2013 Tour de France

Abstract

On 21 July 2013 Chris Froome became only the second British cyclist to win the Tour de France. This paper examines how the events surrounding Froome's victory in the 2013 Tour de France were reported in the British (London-based) print media the day after his victory. Data were collected from nine different daily newspapers on 22 July with a total of 52 pages of coverage devoted to the story. Thematic coding revealed that, despite a comprehensive victory, Froome appeared to be framed as being in the shadow of two other prominent cyclists. Firstly, Froome's victory appeared to be framed within a moral panic surrounding the use of performanceenhancing drugs in cycling, with his achievements partially overshadowed by the 'folk devil' that is Lance Armstrong. Secondly, the data suggested that narratives around British national identity were prevalent within the reporting of Chris Froome, with this reporting particularly focused on the issue of his African heritage. Initial analysis indicated that the British print media actually celebrated Froome's African roots, suggesting that they may be starting to embrace a new postimperial form of national identity that reflects the multicultural or hybrid nature of 21st century Britain. However, we would also argue that Froome may only have achieved an ambivalent position as a British hero and that his African heritage -although celebrated to an extent -means that in the eyes of the British print media he still sits below Sir Bradley Wiggins in what might be described as a 'hierarchy of Britishness'.

Are the times changing enough? Print media trends across four decades

“…Qualitative data for 2014 demonstrates that there are some ongoing trends with general reporting styles. The constant comparison method (Groves and Griggs, 2016) whereby athletes are compared as individuals or groups to others to demonstrate a hierarchy remains a stable feature of reporting but some of the specific traditional reporting strategies employed by the print media to 'other' the female athlete have changed across the decades. These gender specific strategies of non-parallel language include use of titles, prefix of 'Women's' and the use of relationships.…”

“…In these reports there was often only a single or limited number of British athletes so the hierarchy of nationality was subtly played across nationalities. Groves and Griggs (2016) also note that the British print media have become more forgiving of the hybridity of dual identities amongst athletes in contrast to Poulton and Maguire (2012) who noted that the "plastic Brit" (non-native British national) narrative was prevalent in the lead up to The association of Bouchard with a pseudo British heritage allows the media to vicariously frame national identity where none exists.…”

‘Battle of the sixes’: Investigating print media representations of female professional golfers competing in a men’s tour event

“…It's really cool to go through, I don't think a lot of people thought that we would do that well. (The Press Association, 5 May) Groves and Griggs (2016) draw attention to the media technique of the constant comparison method, whereby athletes are compared to others (in this case, women to men), in order to demonstrate a hierarchy. Clearly, framing the men's need for success against the lower expectation of the women re-emphasises the hierarchical relationship of men over women within golf cultures.…”

Cycling alone: Team Sky’s difficult quest for credibility during the 2015 Tour de France

“…However, despite Team Sky’s efforts at transparency, they are overshadowed by the dark story of doping in cycling; Froome’s victory in the 2013 Tour de France was partly obscured by Lance Armstrong’s cumbersome legacy (Groves and Griggs, 2016). When Froome won the 2014 Tour de Romandie, he was questioned about his use of Ventolin spray (salbutamol) during the race because the therapeutic use exemption he received from the International Cycling Union (UCI) was considered suspicious (Lassalette, 2014; Thomas-Commin, 2014).…”