Ridge Preservation With and Without Primary Wound Closure: A Case Series

Kim, David M.; Angelis, Nicola De; Camelo, Marcelo; Nevins, M; Schüpbach, Peter; Nevins, Myron

doi:10.11607/prd.1463

Cited by 40 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The graft volume percentage of the two experimental groups was significantly different, which was contrary to the previous report presenting no significant difference in the remaining graft amount between the group with primary membrane closure and that with secondary membrane closure 8. A possible reason for this discrepancy could be the different type of graft materials, barrier membranes, and evaluation methods.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 95%

“…Although this method provides valuable information, it not only requires a considerable amount of time and cost for analysis,10 but also has limitations for practical usage in bone research due to irreversible sample preparation 11. Therefore, several researchers have adopted simple 2D histometry in biomaterial-treated bone defects to evaluate a particular tissue amount 8,12,13…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Instead of using stereologic histomorphometry, simple 2D histometry has been frequently adopted in biomaterial studies 8,12,13. Although the authors of these reports mentioned that they carefully selected histologic specimens, these 2D data often generate excessively high variation and uncertainty that hinder accurate estimation of the samples' real properties.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation

Park

Kim

et al. 2014

Imaging Sci Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study evaluated the efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation methods with and without primary wound closure and the relationship between histometric and micro-computed tomographic (CT) data.Materials and MethodsPorcine hydroxyapatite with polytetrafluoroethylene membrane was implanted into a canine extraction socket. The density of the total mineralized tissue, remaining hydroxyapatite, and new bone was analyzed by histometry and micro-CT. The statistical association between these methods was evaluated.ResultsHistometry and micro-CT showed that the group which underwent alveolar preservation without primary wound closure had significantly higher new bone density than the group with primary wound closure (P<0.05). However, there was no significant association between the data from histometry and micro-CT analysis.ConclusionThese results suggest that alveolar ridge preservation without primary wound closure enhanced new bone formation more effectively than that with primary wound closure. Further investigation is needed with respect to the comparison of histometry and micro-CT analysis.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation

Park

Kim

et al. 2014

Imaging Sci Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Favourable results in maintaining ridge dimension and vital bone formation were demonstrated in ARP without primary flap closure (i.e. an open‐healing approach) (Cardaropoli, Tamagnone, Roffredo, Gaveglio, & Cardaropoli, ; Cho, Park, & Shin, ; Kim et al, ). This approach can be beneficial to both clinicians and patients, due to its minimally traumatic nature (Lee, Lee, Koo, Seol, & Lee, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Lim

Shin

Cho

et al. 2019

J Clinic Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To determine the effect of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in molar sites without primary flap closure. Materials and Methods Three groups were established: extraction sockets grafted with deproteinized bovine bone mineral containing 10% collagen (DBBM‐C) and covered by a native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) (test group 1), sockets grafted with DBBM‐C only (test group 2), and sockets that healed naturally (control group). Primary flap closure was not attempted. Conebeam computed tomography scans were obtained immediately and then 4 months after ARP. A biopsy was performed. The change of the marginal bone level was measured. Results There was significantly less horizontal resorption in test group 1 than in the control group at levels 1 mm (−1.02 ± 0.88 [mean ± SD] vs. −4.44 ± 3.71 mm) and 3 mm (−0.31 ± 1.51 vs. −2.27 ± 1.15 mm) below the crest, and significantly less vertical reduction in the midcrestal area in test group 1 than in test group 2 (−0.25 ± 0.95 vs. −1.15 ± 1.63 mm) (p < .05). There were no significant differences between test groups in clinical and histomorphometric measurements. All groups exhibited stable marginal bone levels after 1 year of loading. Conclusion Alveolar ridge preservation without primary flap closure in molar areas was effective in minimizing ridge resorption and facilitated implant treatment.

show abstract

“…9 Kim et al reported that on light microscopic level, new bone can be seen adhering to the bioceramic graft particles on re-entering the socket. 10 Simonpiori et al summarized the advantages of PRF as it maintains and protects graft materials, serving as biologic connector between bone particles. It integrates fibrin network into regenerative site and facilitates cellular migration (neoangiogenesis).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Socket Preservation at Molar Site using Platelet Rich Fibrin and Bioceramics for Implant Site Development

Pathak¹,

Gupta²,

Chowdhary³

et al. 2013

Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The extraction socket preservation technique conserves the alveolar architecture and prevents hard and soft tissue collapse that minimizes the necessity for future augmentation procedures. Also, considerable interest has recently emerged over the potential benefits of using platelet rich fibrin (PRF), a highly concentrated form of platelets power packed with growth factors encased in a leukocyte rich matrix that enhances osteogenic differentiation and bone repair. This article describes the currently improved technique utilizing alloplasts with autologous PRF to be implemented for preserving a future implant site.

show abstract

Ridge Preservation With and Without Primary Wound Closure: A Case Series

Cited by 40 publications

References 0 publications

Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation

Comparison of alveolar ridge preservation methods using three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic analysis and two-dimensional histometric evaluation

Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open‐healing approach: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Socket Preservation at Molar Site using Platelet Rich Fibrin and Bioceramics for Implant Site Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About