Ridge Planted Pigeonpea and Furrow Planted Rice in an Intercropping System as Affected by Nitrogen and Weed Management

Yadav, Manoj Kumar; Singh, R. B.; Mahajan, Gaurav; Yadav, S. K.; Kumar, Rakesh; Singh, Mahesh Kumar; Singh, Ashwani Kumar; Yadav, Amalesh

doi:10.5772/34793

Cited by 3 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"Pre emergence application of oxadiargyl fb clodinafop as PoE reduced the weed density significantly over the other treatments" [49]. "The minimum weed density and dry matter accumulation of weeds were registered under manual weeding (117 m -2 ) followed by quizalofop-p-ethyl 60 g ha -1 (288 m -2 )" as reported by Kumar et al [30].…”

Section: Weed Density and Weed Dry Weightmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…(PE) + 1 HW at 25 DAS resulted in the lowest weed index in mustard" (Patel et al [55]. "In mustard crops, hand weeding provided a lower weed index than quizalofop-p-ethyl 60 g ha -1" [30]. Jangir et al [33] concluded that "the application of pendimethalin 1 kg ha -1 as PE + quizalofop-p-ethyl 0.04 kg ha -1 as PoE + HW and intercultivation (IC) at 40 DAS resulted in the lowest weed index, which was comparable to the application of pendimethalin 1.0 kg ha -1 as PE + HW and IC at 40 DAS".…”

Section: Weed Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to Kaur et al [28], "the best and most effective weed control method in mustard was two-hand weeding (25 and 45 DAS), followed by pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha -1" . Kumar et al [30] revealed that "manual weeding had a higher weed control efficiency than quizalofop-ethyl 60 g ha -1" . Das [31] found that "hand weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS had a greater weed control efficacy than pendimethalin 1 kg ha -1 (PE) in mustard".…”

Section: Weed Control Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Optimizing Weed Control: A Review of Integrated Weed Management in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Yernaidu,

Reddy,

Sriram

et al. 2024

JEAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mustard (Brassica juncea L.), a species of the cruciferous family, is the world's third most significant oilseed crop, following soybean and palm. Mustard seeds range in oil content from 37 to 49%. India is the fourth-largest producer of mustard and rapeseed in the world. The most significant issue causing mustard's low yield is weed control. Crop yields are significantly reduced by weeds; in the case of mustard, this can mean a complete failure rate of 15–30%. Crop plants compete with weeds for nutrients, sunlight, space, and water. In addition to lowering crop quality, weeds pose a number of nutritional and environmental hazards. In mustard crops, weed competition is particularly important in the early stages since the crop grows slowly in the first 4–8 weeks after sowing. On the other hand, 15–40 days are the critical window for crop–weed competition. Weed control must be carried out appropriately and on time in order to maximize mustard growth and production. During the early stages of crop growth, 25–30 days after sowing, the traditional practice of hand weeding once is insufficient because weeds always reappear after manual weeding, irrigation, or winter rainfall. More importantly, though, is that these weeds drain a large amount of the soil's moisture and nutrients. Though hand weeding mustard is simple, the expense of doing so is significant due to the scarcity of labor at the appropriate time and the uncontrolled growth of various intra row weeds. Weeds may become tolerant of herbicides despite their regular and high dosage application. Therefore, combined approaches could be the best option to control the complex weed flora in mustard.

show abstract

Section: Weed Density and Weed Dry Weightmentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Weed Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Weed Control Efficiencymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Optimizing Weed Control: A Review of Integrated Weed Management in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Yernaidu,

Reddy,

Sriram

et al. 2024

JEAI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These conditions can enhance plant health and productivity, resulting in higher seed yields. The spatial arrangement in this method also reduces plant competition for resources such as light, water, and nutrients, allowing each plant to grow more robustly [38]. Conversely, the broadcasting method often leads to uneven seed distribution and greater intra-species competition, which can inhibit growth and reduce yield.…”

Section: Seed Yield (Kg/ha)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Planting Methods and Weed Control Treatments on Weed Dynamics, Yield and Economics of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Parihar,

Kushwah,

Parmar

et al. 2024

J. Exp. Agric. Int.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Research Farm, College of Agriculture, Gwalior (M.P.), during the 2019 kharif season to investigate the effects of different planting methods and weed control treatments on the weeds, growth, yield, and economics of green gram. The field experiment followed a split-plot design with three planting methods as main plot treatments (broadcasting on a flat bed, line sowing on a flat bed, and ridge and furrow) and five weed management practices as sub-plot treatments (Pendimethalin 1000 g/ha, Diclosulam 26 g/ha, Imazethapyr 75 g/ha, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and weedy check), replicated thrice. The experimental field was primarily infested with narrow-leaved weeds such as Cyperus rotundus, Cynodon dactylon, Echinochloa spp., and Dactyloctenium aegyptium, and broad-leaved weeds like Digera arvensis, Celosia argentea, Commelina benghalensis, and Phyllanthus niruri. Among the herbicidal treatments, Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha effectively controlled both narrow-leaved and broad-leaved weeds, resulting in the lowest weed index. The ridge and furrow planting method recorded the highest values in growth parameters, yield attributes, and seed yield, proving to be more remunerative compared to other methods. These findings indicate that the combination of ridge and furrow planting with effective weed management, particularly using Imazethapyr, optimizes green gram productivity and economic returns.

show abstract

“…The traditional practice of intercropping gained popularity in recent years with suitable changes incorporated in planting pattern. Basically intercropping system helps in reducing risk from epidemic of insect and disease, and overcoming the effect of unfavourable environmental conditions in agro-climatologically less stable regions along with better utilization of solar radiation and inputs like fertilizer and water compared to sole cropping system [11]. Diversification of cropping systems is necessary to get higher yield and returns to maintain soil health, preserve the environment and meet the daily requirement of food and feed for human and animals [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Diverse Intercropping System on Growth Indices, Yield and Profitability of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.): Variety Azad Mahak

Kumar,

Siddiqui,

Prajapati

et al. 2023

IJPSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intercropping enhances crop yield and quality by growing different crop species together on the same piece of land in distinct row combinations. Hence, a field experiment was conducted to study the suitable combination of mustard based intercropping with different crops at students’ instructional farm, C. S. Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur (U.P.) during Rabi season 2021-22. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with nine treatment combinations viz., T1 Sole Mustard, T2 Mustard: Chickpea (1:1), T3 Mustard: Chickpea (2:1), T4 Mustard: Lentil (1:1), T5 Mustard: Lentil (2:1), T6 Mustard: Linseed (1:1), T7 Mustard: Linseed (2:1), T8 Mustard: Field Pea (1:1) and T9 Mustard: Field Pea (2:1) with replicated thrice. The result revealed that growth attributes in the intercropping system were most notably observed in sole Mustard, with the Mustard + Lentil (1:1) system following closely. The Mustard + Lentil (1:1) intercropping system yielded a significantly higher mustard equivalent yield (2.77 t ha-1). Notably, the greatest net returns were obtained from sole Mustard cultivation (INR 151,045.50 ha-1), though the Mustard + Lentil (1:1) system also produced substantial returns (INR 144,001.00 ha-1). Furthermore, the benefit-cost ratio was highest for sole Mustard (5.05), with the Mustard + Lentil (1:1) system (4.82). In conclusion, these results support the superior productivity and profitability of sole Mustard cultivation, closely followed by the Mustard + Lentil (1:1) intercropping system.

show abstract

Ridge Planted Pigeonpea and Furrow Planted Rice in an Intercropping System as Affected by Nitrogen and Weed Management

Cited by 3 publications

References 18 publications

Optimizing Weed Control: A Review of Integrated Weed Management in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Optimizing Weed Control: A Review of Integrated Weed Management in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Effect of Planting Methods and Weed Control Treatments on Weed Dynamics, Yield and Economics of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)

The Effect of Diverse Intercropping System on Growth Indices, Yield and Profitability of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.): Variety Azad Mahak

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About