Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation 2012
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2012.6348004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ridge feature extraction and effect on radio propagation for wireless communications

Abstract: When diffraction of ridges is required for predicting radio signal in mountainous regions, the realistic shape of ridges is often simplified (e.g., as a knife edge or a wedge). Also, the ridge orientation is usually ignored and the EM waves are assumed to be normally incident on the ridge. As more accurate radio propagation prediction is needed for advanced wireless communications, it is necessary to take into account more realistic features of ridges. For example, the slopes and orientation of ridges should b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only when the ridges are all horizontal and parallel one another, the 2D and 3D ray paths are identical. In [1], we have shown that the path loss calculated using 3D ridges may be more than 5 dB different than that using 2D height profiles.…”
Section: The 2d and 3d Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only when the ridges are all horizontal and parallel one another, the 2D and 3D ray paths are identical. In [1], we have shown that the path loss calculated using 3D ridges may be more than 5 dB different than that using 2D height profiles.…”
Section: The 2d and 3d Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…(2) Larger difference between the azimuthal angles ( ) of the two ridges results in larger path loss differences between 2D and 3D for soft polarizations; but for hard polarizations, the trend is opposite, except for one case when = 40° and = 55°. (3) The maximum path loss difference is about 10 dB which is twice the difference for a single ridge as discussed in [1]. …”
Section: The 2d and 3d Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As more and more digital elevation data are available with better resolutions, it is getting more convenient to extract terrain features important for radio propagation modeling such as the mountain peaks and ridges. In [105], a simple method is used to extract 3D ridges from digital elevation data. The extracted ridges then serve as diffraction wedges in simulating the radio wave propagation.…”
Section: Accuracy and Other Development Of Ray Tracing And Propagatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%