2015
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rickettsia and Bartonella Species in Fleas from Reunion Island

Abstract: Abstract. Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia typhi, and Bartonella DNA was detected by molecular tools in 12% of Rattus rattus fleas (Xenopsylla species) collected from Reunion Island. One-third of the infested commensal rodents captured during 1 year carried at least one infected flea. As clinical signs of these zoonoses are non-specific, they are often misdiagnosed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it cannot be stated that these flea species are competent vectors of Bartonella, as they may have consumed Bartonella-infected blood from a host with bacteremia, their role as vectors of these bacteria cannot be ruled out; as such, future laboratory tests to verify their competence are necessary (Billeter et al, 2008). The prevalence of Bartonella in the rodent fleas in our study is within the ranges documented by other authors (2.1%-40.5%), values that vary with respect to the geographical area and flea species analyzed (Loftis et al, 2006;Marie et al, 2006;Li et al, 2007;Bitam et al, 2012;Billeter et al, 2014, Dieme et al, 2015, Lipatova et al, 2015. Bartonella DNA was found in several flea species with variations observed in the infection prevalence of Bartonella detected between flea species (4.2%-100%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it cannot be stated that these flea species are competent vectors of Bartonella, as they may have consumed Bartonella-infected blood from a host with bacteremia, their role as vectors of these bacteria cannot be ruled out; as such, future laboratory tests to verify their competence are necessary (Billeter et al, 2008). The prevalence of Bartonella in the rodent fleas in our study is within the ranges documented by other authors (2.1%-40.5%), values that vary with respect to the geographical area and flea species analyzed (Loftis et al, 2006;Marie et al, 2006;Li et al, 2007;Bitam et al, 2012;Billeter et al, 2014, Dieme et al, 2015, Lipatova et al, 2015. Bartonella DNA was found in several flea species with variations observed in the infection prevalence of Bartonella detected between flea species (4.2%-100%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Several species of Bartonella have been detected in X. cheopis (B. elizabethae, B. grahamii, B. tribocorum, B. rochalimae, B. rattimassiliensis, Bartonella queenslandensis, and Bartonella sp. 1.1C;Billeter et al, 2008;Tsai et al, 2010;Billeter et al, 2011;Dieme et al, 2015), although its competence as a vector has only been determined experimentally for B. elizabethae, which would be eliminated through the feces (McKee et al, 2018). Tetrapsyllus rhombus was another very rare species, but which had a high prevalence of Bartonella DNA; there is no known history of pathogens that this flea species transmits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a third (7/21) of the sera reactive with C. burnetii also reacted with SFGR or TGR or both, and those cross-reactions may result in Q fever seroprevalence overestimation. However, 71% of the participants showing cross-reactions lived in the western dryer part of the island, which is also the habitat of Xenopsylla cheopis , the rat flea, vector of murine typhus [15, 16]. This suggests that cross-reactions might signal previous exposure to multiple pathogens rather than false positives, which is more in keeping with seroprevalence figures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were considered positive when the qPCR1 Ct was <36 and when samples also tested positive using another qPCR system, a standard procedure in our laboratory (17). The mosquitoes infected by the membrane system were also tested by qPCR2 using the following primers: Rfel_ guano_MBF, 5′GCATATACTTTATTGTGCGCAA-GTT-3′; Rfel_guano_MBR, 5′-TTTATCGATTGACAGAAGAAGAAATCA-3′; and Rfel_guano_MBP, 6FAM-TCGCTTTTTGGGATTGTTTGCCAGA, which target a guanosine polyphosphate gene (qPCR2) (42). For the animal model, in addition to the qPCR1 system, the presence of R. felis was confirmed by qPCR3, using specific primers and probes F (5′-CCCTTTTCGTAACGCTTTGCT-3′), R (5′-GGGCTAAAC-CAGGGAAACCT-3′) and P (6-FAM-TGTTCCGGTTTTAACGGCAGATACCCA-TAMR), which target a fragment of the R. felis Orf B gene (17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%