Richard Nesbit Evans

Evans, James; Evans, Matthew; Evans, Stephen G.; Evans, E. Edward

doi:10.1136/bmj.i3110

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In all the models, the MRR are described as a function in terms of the characteristics of the particle (velocity, radius, and density) and the mechanical properties of the target material properties (hard ness, toughness, and Young's modulus) which are the main varia bles affecting the MRR. Thus from the literature review, we learn that the material removal in brittle materials can occur in different regimes depending on the impact conditions [21,26]. The damage in ductile regime is strongly influenced by material hardness (Hw) of the workpiece.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The material removal mechanism in VANILA process has close resemblance to that of erosion pro cess of brittle materials due to solid particle impact [8,9] and machining processes including abrasive jet machining process [10], noncontact ultrasonic abrasive machining [11], and impact lithography process [12], Material removal by impact of solid to estimate the MRR have been theoretically derived by Evans et ah, [21], Marshall et ah, [22], Aquaro and Fontani [23], Wakuda et ah, [24], and Wiederhom and Hockey [25] based on empirical equations using linear regression data analysis. In all the models, the MRR are described as a function in terms of the characteristics of the particle (velocity, radius, and density) and the mechanical properties of the target material properties (hard ness, toughness, and Young's modulus) which are the main varia bles affecting the MRR.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Modeling of Material Removal Rate in Vibration Assisted Nano Impact-Machining by Loose Abrasives

James

Sundaram

2015

Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vibration assisted nano impact-machining by loose abrasives (VANILA) is a novel nano machining process that combines the principles o f vibration-assisted abrasive machining, and dp-based nanomachining, to perform target specific nano abrasive machining o f hard and brittle materials. An atomic force microscope (AFM) is used as a platform in this pro cess wherein, nano abrasives, injected in slurry between the workpiece and the vibrating AFM probe, impact the workpiece and cause nanoscale material removal. The objective o f this study is to develop a mathematical model to determine the material removal rate (MRR) in the VANILA process. The experimental machining results reveal that the material removal happens primarily in ductile mode due to repeated deformation which happens at near normal angles o f impact. A predictive model fo r MRR during the VANILA process is analytically developed based on elastoplastic impact theory fo r normal angles o f impact. The model is validated through a series o f experiments performed on silicon and borosilicate glass subs mates and the results confirm that the model is capable o f predicting the machining results within 10% deviation.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling of Material Removal Rate in Vibration Assisted Nano Impact-Machining by Loose Abrasives

James

Sundaram

2015

Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The legal strategy was designed so that "Lipstadt's allegations of manipulation and falsification could be tested" and proved true. 225 The defence sought to prove that the several instances in which Lipstadt mentioned Irving in her book could be taken as a single allegation which communicates a "common sting". 226 In other words, the defence could condense the "libellous"that Irving is a Holocaust denierand therefore, pursue that line of argument throughout.…”

Section: The Legal Team's Carefully Constructed Response To the Libelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…276 As Evans argues, Irving "tried to distance Hitler from all forms of violence against the Jews" in an attempt to cast Hitler in a "more favourable light than the document actually allows". 277 This exclusion of information left the reader with the impression that Hitler was discouraging acts of violence against the Jews. During Rampton's cross-examination, Irving excused himself by claiming "that was author's licence", and that sometimes you have to "help the reader along".…”

Section: Mr Irvingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Holocaust Denial on Trial”: An Analysis of Deborah Lipstadt’s Approach

Bidwell¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysing the methods of countering Holocaust denial in a comparative manner proves a most helpful platform to assess historical methodology and practice. This research seeks to evaluate the differing agendas and perspectives between historical and legal approaches to refuting Holocaust denial from the David Irving v. Penguin Books Ltd. and Deborah Lipstadt libel trial. I owe a huge debt to Lance Cooper, partner of The Cooper Firm in Atlanta, Georgia, for providing the opportunity to work as a legal research intern at the firm before I began my research in September 2017. This provided a foundational understanding of legal strategies, the process of discovery, collecting and organising source material, as well as enabling me to refine my research and analytical skills in a legal setting. Working at a US-based firm was essential to gain a greater awareness of the American culture in which Professor Deborah Lipstadt operates, and to understand her criticisms of English libel law compared to US law. While in Atlanta, I was able to conduct research at Emory University in preparation for the Masters degree. I am especially thankful to Professor Deborah Lipstadt for kindly agreeing to meet with me to discuss my research in September 2017. Her input and advice at such an early stage in the research was critical, as it prompted new questions to consider in this thesis. Most especially, I am indebted to Professor Lipstadt for being so willing to put me in contact with a number of individuals from the defence team of the Irving v. Penguin case, for interviews, which proved fruitful. As a result, gratitude and thanks are owed to both Richard Rampton QC and Heather Rogers QC, for taking valuable time out of their schedules to meet with me for an extended interview in May 2018, to discuss the legal aspects of the Irving v. Penguin case and its implications. I am grateful to them both for their patience in answering my many questions and for their sage legal insights which proved invaluable to this research. Special thanks to Heather Rogers for continuing to keep me informed with current British legal cases involving Holocaust deniers, which has helped me to draw connections with contemporary legal activity in Chapter 6. To Joseph Fowler, partner at Hartley, Rowe & Fowler (Atlanta, Georgia), I owe my thanks for his advice and his helpful legal mindset which enabled me to frame my questions in preparation for my interview with Richard Rampton and Heather Rogers. Thanks to Professor Nik Wachsmann for my contact with him and for his enthusiasm for my research. Professor Wachsmann served as a researcher to Professor Richard J. Evans in the Irving v. Penguin case, so I am thankful to have been able to attend his workshop on "Sources, Archives, Evidence and the Teaching of the Holocaust" at the Wiener Library in December 2017, which provided useful additional training in research practices for this Masters degree.

show abstract

“…Η παράσταση της Μονής Ξηροποτάμου είναι φανερό ότι συνδέει τις επτά Αρετές-επτά Κίονες με την Εκκλησία, που σαν δυτική επίδραση ενσωματώνεται στην παράσταση 3346 . Το στοιχείο αυτό, σύμφωνα με την άποψη του Δ. Δ. Τριανταφυλλόπουλου, λειτουργεί στους ζωγράφους της τουρκοκρατίας, όχι σα μια απλή δυτική επίδραση, αλλά σαν ένα εικονογραφικό στοιχείο που έχει στόχο να δείξει με περισσότερο κατανοητό τρόπο τη διδασκαλία της Εκκλησίας 3347 .…”

Section: μαρτύριο αγίωνunclassified

Οι Ζωγραφοι Κωνσταντινος Και Αθανασιοσ:το Εργο Τους Στο Αγιον Ορος (1752-1783)

Τσιγαρασ¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Α. ΤΑ ΜΝΗΜΕΙΑ 1. Ενυπόγραφα έργα. α. Καθολικό της Μονής Γενεσίου της Θεοτόκου στην Αρδένιτσα (1744). Η Μονή της Αρδένιτσας 19 βρίσκεται πάνω σε λόφο, κοντά στο σημερινό Φίερι και εκκλησιαστικά ανήκει στη μητρόπολη Βελεγράδων 20 . Το Καθολικό, μια τρίκλιτη βασιλική με υπερυψωμένο το μεσαίο κλίτος 21 , κτίστηκε στα 1730 22 στα ερείπια παλαιότερου πιθανότατα κτίσματος της εποχής των Δεσποτών της Ηπείρου (13ος-14ος αι.) 23 . Το μνημείο αναστηλώθηκε το έτος 1986, καθαρίστηκαν οι τοιχογραφίες του και μελετήθηκε από αλβανούς επιστήμονες 24 . Δυο μεγαλογράμματες επιγραφές, που βρίσκονται στο υπέρθυρο της δυτικής εισόδου του κυρίως ναού, παρέχουν πληροφορίες για το μνημείο. Η πρώτη αναφέρεται στην ανοικοδόμηση του Καθολικού και η δεύτερη, που αναφέρεται στην εικονογράφηση του Καθολικού, είναι ουσιαστικά η υπογραφή των ζωγράφων. Μεταξύ των δύο επιγραφών παρεμβάλλεται η παράσταση του αναπεσόντος Χριστού. Την πρώτη επιγραφή δημοσίευσαν ο Skender Mihalcka 25 , η Ε. Δορκοφίκη 26 , ο Γ. Γιακουμής 27 , ο Μ. Τρίτος 28 και ο Δ. Καμαρούλιας 29 . 10 τιμιότατων αρχόντων* και έπιλήπον χριστηανών* τ ης αυτής / μαχαλάς Σκαμελίου, * έπι έτους * 1744 / έν μηνή 'Οκτώβριος 25 / δια χειρός τον αϋταδέλφον Κωνσταντίνου, και Αθανασίου, * έκ πώλεος Κοριτζ'ας Η αγιογράφηση του ναού ολοκληρώθηκε με τις συνδρομές των αρχόντων και των πιστών της συνοικίας Σκαμνελίκι στις 25 Οκτωβρίου 1744 40 , όταν αρχιεπίσκοπος Αχρίδας ήταν ο Ιωάσαφ. Ο επιφανής αυτός ιεράρχης, που καταγόταν από τη Μοσχόπολη 41 , εκλέχτηκε το 1706 επίσκοπος Πρεσπών, στις 4 Ιουνίου 1709 μητροπολίτης Κορυτσάς 42 και στις 5 Ιουλίου 1718 αρχιεπίσκοπος Αχρίδας 43 . Προεδρικά διατηρούσε και την επαρχία της Κορυτσάς από το 1718 μέχρι το θάνατο του στις 22 Οκτωβρίου 1745 44 . Συνεπώς επειδή ήταν και "Πρόεδρος Κορυτσάς" αναφέρεται στην επιγραφή ως ο ιεράρχης της περιοχής. γ. Προστώον του ναού Αγίου Αθανασίου στη Μοσχόπολη. 1745 45 . Η επιγραφή, που υπάρχει στην είσοδο του νάρθηκα, δημοσιεύθηκε από τον Κ. Χ. Σκενδέρη 46 και αργότερα την αναδημοσίευσαν ο Ε. Κουρίλας 47 40

show abstract

Richard Nesbit Evans

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Modeling of Material Removal Rate in Vibration Assisted Nano Impact-Machining by Loose Abrasives

Modeling of Material Removal Rate in Vibration Assisted Nano Impact-Machining by Loose Abrasives

“Holocaust Denial on Trial”: An Analysis of Deborah Lipstadt’s Approach

Οι Ζωγραφοι Κωνσταντινος Και Αθανασιοσ:το Εργο Τους Στο Αγιον Ορος (1752-1783)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About