Rich Environments for Active Open Distance Learning: Looks Good in Theory but Is It Really What Learners Want

Abstract

In the open distance learning environment, efforts are made to engage students and provide rich environments for active learning (REALs). This article describes exploratory research undertaken on a fourth-year Tourism Management module. The research investigated two different study guides for different years – 2012 students using an innovative guide with learner engagement tools designed in line with current learning theory, to achieve a REAL; and 2011 learners using a traditional study guide with far fewer engagement tools. The two consecutive cohorts completed a quantitative survey designed from theory on learner engagement, motivation and interactivity. The survey investigated learners’ experiences of the implementation of four constructs, namely course design; engagement; learning activities; and the integrated construct of relevance, application, bonding and ownership. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, non-parametric correlations and cross-tabulations. Results suggest that this REAL does aid learning but not to the extent anticipated, and that it may be too rich. In light of the greater debate regarding the design of ODL material to maximise learning, recommendations are made to discerningly regulate the richness and depth of learning material, avoid overload of isolated learners, and gradually introduce REALs.

Online Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution: Determining the Right Connections for the Student

“…The questionnaire items covered opinions on online learning (the focus of this article) as well as student perceptions of the study material (addressed in prior research by Queiros, de Villiers, van Zyl, Conradie, and van Zyl, 2015). Most questionnaire items used a 5-point Likert scale: strongly disagree (SD), disagree (D), unsure (U), agree (A), strongly agree (SA).…”