2012
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice sequences of relations

Abstract: We propose a framework to study the computational complexity of definable relations on a structure. Many of the notions we discuss are old, but the viewpoint is new. We believe that all the pieces fit together smoothly under this new point of view. We also survey related results in the area. More concretely, we study the space of sequences of relations over a given structure. On this space, we develop notions of c.e.-ness, reducibility, join and jump. These notions are equivalent to other notions studied in ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spring of 2012, Russian, Bulgarian, and U.S. researchers gathered in Chicago for further discussions of the notions of jump, at the workshop "Definability in computable structures", funded mainly by the Packard Foundation. Later, Montalbán proved that the different-looking definitions are equivalent (see [22]).…”
Section: Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spring of 2012, Russian, Bulgarian, and U.S. researchers gathered in Chicago for further discussions of the notions of jump, at the workshop "Definability in computable structures", funded mainly by the Packard Foundation. Later, Montalbán proved that the different-looking definitions are equivalent (see [22]).…”
Section: Sketch Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pregeometries. As we have already mentioned in the introduction, it follows from [AKMS89] and [Chi90] that there is a tuple d in M such that these relations are uniformly defined by computable infinitary Σ c 1 formulas with parameters d (the uniformity comes from a small modification to the same proof -see, for example, [Mon12]). See [AK00] for a background on computable infinitary logic L c ω 1 ω .…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we use the latter. (We refer the reader to [, Definition 5.1] for the history of the different definitions explained in more detail.) This is an important concept because, as it turned out, many constructions in the area can be better understood using the notion of jump.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%