2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice ponding date detection in Australia using Sentinel-2 and Planet Fusion imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weather data included observations up to January 13, followed by GFS forecasts for 14 days, then the average of historical observations after the forecast window. The ponding prediction also used a logistic regression model, with remote sensing features (Brinkhoff et al., 2022), and predicted a ponding date of December 15. The probability of having reached PI and flowering are shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Weather data included observations up to January 13, followed by GFS forecasts for 14 days, then the average of historical observations after the forecast window. The ponding prediction also used a logistic regression model, with remote sensing features (Brinkhoff et al., 2022), and predicted a ponding date of December 15. The probability of having reached PI and flowering are shown.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combined (from most accurate to least accurate): Observations of past weather from the SILO dataset, 14 day forecasts of up‐coming weather, from the Global Forecast System data produced by NOAA and delivered in Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017), Historical SILO data to fill in dates beyond the forecast, created by averaging 2000–2022 data per date. These fused weather data were input to the phenology prediction models, along with sowing methods and sowing dates provided by growers, and ponding dates predicted using remote sensing using the method described by Brinkhoff et al. (2022). This method classified each date as pre‐ or post‐ponding using a time‐series of Sentinel‐2 satellite reflectance data, which are sensitive to rice field ponding status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GEE pre-processed the data with the Sentinel-1 Toolbox to remove thermal noise, radiometric calibration, orbital correction, and terrain correction (https://developers.google.com/earthengine/guides/sentinel1). Sentinel-2 (referred to Sentinel 2A/B) Level-2A (Surface Reflectance, SR) images have many artefacts and overcorrected and therefore were substituted with Sentinel-2 Level-1C (Top-of-Atmosphere Reflectance, TOA) (Brinkhoff et al, 2022;Fatchurchman et al, 2022). More information on the Sentinel-2 MSI product can be found in the User Guides on the ESA website (https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/user-guides/sentinel-2-msi, accessed on 7 September 2023).…”
Section: Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Time-series Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating Sentinel 2 data in this study would have enhanced the frequency of satellite imagery [30], potentially benefiting the two-week clustering method. However, Sentinel data became available in Australia only in December 2018 [65], precluding the utilisation of crop production data from the 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons. The absence of these data years would have considerably diminished the dataset available for model development.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%