2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-586877/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rice miR1432 Fine-Tunes The Balance of Yield and Blast Disease Resistance Via Different Modules

Abstract: microRNAs act as fine-tuners in the regulation of plant growth and resistance against biotic and abiotic stress. Here we demonstrate that rice miR1432 fine-tunes yield and blast disease resistance via different modules. The expression of miR1432 is differentially regulated in the susceptible and resistance accessions by the infection of the blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Overexpression of miR1432 leads to compromised resistance and decreased yield, whereas blocking miR1432 using a target mimic of miR1432 res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above information clearly shows that ECD04 genome may greatly help to reconcile different names used for the same genes and fundamentally rectify the confusion. Previous research has demonstrated that the enhancement of crop disease resistance might be at the cost of crop yield (Brown, 2003; Buschges et al ., 1997; Denance et al ., 2013; Deng et al ., 2017; Gao et al ., 2021; Tian et al ., 2003), but no apparent negative relationship was observed between disease resistance and plant growth or development due to different balance mechanisms (Chandran et al ., 2018; Cui et al ., 2020; Deng et al ., 2017; Li et al ., 2021; Ning et al ., 2017). In addition, as for ECD04 with 15 CR loci but exhibiting no obvious yield loss when acquiring the resistance trait, it remains to be clarified whether this is a new mechanism that coordinates the balance between resistance and growth in ECD04.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above information clearly shows that ECD04 genome may greatly help to reconcile different names used for the same genes and fundamentally rectify the confusion. Previous research has demonstrated that the enhancement of crop disease resistance might be at the cost of crop yield (Brown, 2003; Buschges et al ., 1997; Denance et al ., 2013; Deng et al ., 2017; Gao et al ., 2021; Tian et al ., 2003), but no apparent negative relationship was observed between disease resistance and plant growth or development due to different balance mechanisms (Chandran et al ., 2018; Cui et al ., 2020; Deng et al ., 2017; Li et al ., 2021; Ning et al ., 2017). In addition, as for ECD04 with 15 CR loci but exhibiting no obvious yield loss when acquiring the resistance trait, it remains to be clarified whether this is a new mechanism that coordinates the balance between resistance and growth in ECD04.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that although both studies involved transgenic manipulation of miR1432, neither has considered the putative ACA targets, most likely due to a target search effort focusing exclusively on coding sequences. A role for the miR1432‐CML regulatory module in rice immunity was further supported by directly manipulating the expression of the miR1432‐targeted CML, with higher levels of CML expression associated with an enhanced disease resistance (Li et al ., 2021). We noticed that evidence for OsACOT (acyl‐CoA thioesterase) being a miR1432 target, as presented in Zhao et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6), a member of the proposed miR391 superfamily. Although the functional significance for the emergence of dual‐targeting miR1432 in Poaceae remains to be examined, two recent reports collectively showed an important regulatory role for rice miR1432 in both grain development and defense response to the fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae (Zhao et al ., 2019; Li et al ., 2021). It is worth noting that although both studies involved transgenic manipulation of miR1432, neither has considered the putative ACA targets, most likely due to a target search effort focusing exclusively on coding sequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of miRNAs have been characterized as immune regulators in rice in response to multiple pathogens (Li et al ., 2014; Lian et al ., 2016; Lin et al ., 2016; W. Q. Li et al ., 2018; Jia et al ., 2020). For example, 13 miRNAs act as negative regulators of rice blast disease resistance, including miR156 (Zhang et al ., 2020), miR164a (Z. Wang et al ., 2018), miR167d (Zhao et al ., 2020), miR168 (Wang et al ., 2021), miR169 (Y. Li et al ., 2017), miR1871 (Li et al ., 2022a), miR1873 (Zhou et al ., 2020), miR319 (Zhang et al ., 2018), miR439 (Lu et al ., 2021), miR1432 (Li et al ., 2021b), miR396 (Chandran et al ., 2018), miR530 (Li et al ., 2021a) and miR535 (Zhang et al ., 2022). By contrast, seven miRNAs play a positive role in rice immunity against M. oryzae by suppressing their target genes, including miR7695 (Campo et al ., 2013), miR166h‐166k (Salvador‐Guirao et al ., 2018), miR398b (Y. Li et al ., 2019), miR162a (Li et al ., 2020), miR159a (Chen et al ., 2021), miR171b (Li et al ., 2022b) and miR812w (Campo et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%