“…In spite of the high conservation of the structure of this element and the apparent conservation of its function as shown by these studies, we do not have a clear idea of what its function might be in the spliceosome+ Its location near the sites of splicing chemistry have led to speculation that it plays a role in the active site of the spliceosome (reviewed in Nilsen, 1998;Collins & Guthrie, 2000)+ Several groups have suggested parallels with features of various ribozymes including the hairpin ribozyme (Tani & Ohshima, 1991;Sun & Manley, 1995) and domain 5 of group II self-splicing introns (see discussions in Sun & Manley, 1997;Costa et al+, 1998;Nilsen, 1998)+ The group II domain 5 comparison is particularly interesting+ A recent revision of the proposed structure of the domain 5 stem-loop has emphasized the similarity between it and the U6 (or U6atac) intramolecular stem-loop (Costa et al+, 1998)+ A phosphorothioate modification-interference study of domain 5 in self-splicing identified a phosphate group in the bulge region as important for splicing catalysis (Chanfreau & Jacquier, 1994)+ This phosphate is located in a very similar position to one identified as important for U6 snRNA function in in vitro pre-mRNA splicing in both yeast (Fabrizio & Abelson, 1992) and nematodes (Yu et al+, 1995)+ Recent investigations of both phosphorothioate diastereomers at this position in yeast U6 snRNA have revealed a metal ion specificity switch for the first step of splicing (Yean et al+, 2000)+ This suggests that U6 snRNA participates in the catalysis of splicing through metal ion coordination and places this stem-loop element at or very near the catalytic center of the spliceosome+ Pyle's group has also suggested that the bulge and lower stem regions of domain 5 serve to position a critical metal ion for group II splicing (Konforti et al+, 1998)+ Such a function would mainly involve the positioning of phosphate groups to coordinate the metal and would be compatible with many but perhaps not all base paired sequences within the stem region+ Basespecific interactions would be limited to residues in unpaired regions and functional groups in the major and minor groves of the helical regions+ Such a function would fit with the apparent tolerance of the stem regions of U6atac snRNA for many but not all substitutions that maintain base pairing+…”